OT: Shady McCoy allegedly beat his gf

[LaterGator]

Actually in looking at multiple documents there were several items that McCoy had demanded several times. They were demanded again during the attempted robbery, aggravated assault etc.

The residence was McCoy's property. She had some documentation for living there rent free at least at some point. They had been there for about 2 years.

McCoy and also a friend had attempted to serve notice for eviction, had some procedural issues, and finally did. The case was scheduled to be heard on July 10th, but she obtained a delay until August. Hearing a case and deciding it are not always the same.

He did try to remove items from the residence but were stopped by police when she noticed the attempt remotely on surveillance cameras. After that he had those cameras removed and installed a new system she did not have access to. ...Presumably the entry during the robbery/assault she would have not been able to secure the residence if someone in control enabled it, or of course if she had left it unlocked. ...What is on those cameras might be very constructive.

 

[XLIX]

dude, seriously just stop. You do not have to have a lease in California if it’s less than a year. If it’s been longer than a year then the tenant gets 60 days prior to lease expiration If you are not renewing their lease. If they stop paying or refuse to leave then you go through the legal process to evict them.

I’m going by California laws which I clearly stated in my other posts. I don’t know what the laws are out there which I also stated in my other posts. My whole point is that you can get her out if you want to given that you were going through proper legal process.

oh boy. Let’s just call it a day shall we?

That’s cool how you’ve totally changed what you were saying, but at least now you’ve come around to be reasonably accurate. I’m glad I taught you something.

 

[LaterGator]

That’s cool how you’ve totally changed what you were saying, but at least now you’ve come around to be reasonably accurate. I’m glad I taught you something.

I too changed re the residence, not the jewelry.... I can learn new tricks though, or at least reading.

It's his house, but he is still in for a battle on that front.

 

[TheRainMaker]

That’s cool how you’ve totally changed what you were saying, but at least now you’ve come around to be reasonably accurate. I’m glad I taught you something.

What did I change? Okay then. Let’s just end it at that then. No point of going any further.

The only thing you taught me is that you could squat in a house and then the property is now yours. Lol.

 

[XLIX]

What did I change? Okay then. Let’s just end it at that then. No point of going any further.

The only thing you taught me is that you could squat in a house and then the property is now yours. Lol.

You went from "Unless she is on title or paying rent, there’s no reason why he can’t get her out of the house ... The only thing I need to know is whether she was paying rent or she’s actually on title" to "My whole point is that you can get her out if you want to given that you were going through proper legal process."

Like I said, I am glad I taught you something.

 

[TheRainMaker]

You went from "Unless she is on title or paying rent, there’s no reason why he can’t get her out of the house ... The only thing I need to know is whether she was paying rent or she’s actually on title" to "My whole point is that you can get her out if you want to given that you were going through proper legal process."

Like I said, I am glad I taught you something.

I see nothing to where I changed my argument. Never did I say you can do anything illegal to get her out. You are reaching.

Please reread my original post where I said you get the Sheriff involved but it’s a long process.

I also clarified myself regarding the eviction process when Andy Johnson and Ras IR-Dowling responded to one of my posts well before the one you just quoted me on.

Try rereading my responses before making claims like that.

And get over yourself, you didn’t teach me anything other than your squatting theory.

 

[Huckleberry1]

Runningback who played Patriots suspect in violent crime.

 

[XLIX]

I see nothing to where I changed my argument. Never did I say you can do anything illegal to get her out. You are reaching.

Please reread my original post where I said you get the Sheriff involved but it’s a long process.

I also clarified myself regarding the eviction process when Andy Johnson and Ras IR-Dowling responded to one of my posts well before the one you just quoted me on.

Try rereading my responses before making claims like that.

And Get over yourself, you didn’t teach me anything other than your squatting theory.

You're welcome, my friend. Always glad to help!!

 

[TheRainMaker]

You're welcome, my friend. Always glad help!!

Glad we cleared it up. So shall we get back on topic? How's the investigation going for Shady?

 

[Tuck]

Wouldn’t the most obvious defense for shady be to say something along the lines of, “I sent a guy over to ask for the jewelry back. I never told him to assault her or commit a crime.” Then it gets down to, will the guy sing to save his own skin or can the prosecution come up with proof that a crime was discussed between the two of them.

 

[Ring 6]

Wouldn’t the most obvious defense for shady be to say something along the lines of, “I sent a guy over to ask for the jewelry back. I never told him to assault her or commit a crime.” Then it gets down to, will the guy sing to save his own skin or can the prosecution come up with proof that a crime was discussed between the two of them.

No because he has no right to the jewelry so sending someone to take it, is sending someone to steal it, and everything that follows falls on McCoy as a conspirator.

 

[XLIX]

Wouldn’t the most obvious defense for shady be to say something along the lines of, “I sent a guy over to ask for the jewelry back. I never told him to assault her or commit a crime.” Then it gets down to, will the guy sing to save his own skin or can the prosecution come up with proof that a crime was discussed between the two of them.

That would still mark him as an accomplice. His best (only) bet is to somehow convince everyone he had absolutely no knowledge that any of that was going to happen and he did not give anyone permission to enter the house. Whether or not that's actually true is yet to be determined....

Quite honestly, I find it highly likely he sent the guy because apparently he did something very similar at an earlier date.... that's just my opinion and not substantiated (yet) so I reserve the right to change my mind when more facts surface....

 

[FreeTedWilliams]

Possible, also possible he asked the guy to try to get the jewelry back and things went sideways without shady's knowledge. It looks like he was on the verge of her getting legally evicted so why do this the day before. Lot of unanswered questions at this point.

That's not how the conspiracy charge works. If you charge someone with conspiracy, then they are equally guilty for all the crimes committed in furtherance of the conspiracy, irregardless if they have knowledge of, or participated in the act. Once you comitt one overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, you are considered liable for all the acts of the conspiracy. So even if McCoy sent them to what he thought was an empty house to take the jewelry, he is still criminally liable for all the acts that followed in furtherance of the conspiracy.

 

[chasa]

the latest update is that the ex is no longer sure that McCoy sent people to rough her up.

Report: Ex-girlfriend no longer certain of LeSean McCoy's involvement in attack

this story keeps getting stranger

 

[LaterGator]

the latest update is that the ex is no longer sure that McCoy sent people to rough her up.

Report: Ex-girlfriend no longer certain of LeSean McCoy's involvement in attack

this story keeps getting stranger

Cha ching, sounding like the Ray Rice thing, and many others. So much easier to get paid up front than go through court for a settlement.

 

[sambam94]

the latest update is that the ex is no longer sure that McCoy sent people to rough her up.

Report: Ex-girlfriend no longer certain of LeSean McCoy's involvement in attack

this story keeps getting stranger

paid off

 

[Deus Irae]

the latest update is that the ex is no longer sure that McCoy sent people to rough her up.

Report: Ex-girlfriend no longer certain of LeSean McCoy's involvement in attack

this story keeps getting stranger

Cha ching, sounding like the Ray Rice thing, and many others. So much easier to get paid up front than go through court for a settlement.

paid off

Given the speed of developments, it's more likely concern about a defamation lawsuit.

 

[LaterGator]

Given the speed of developments, it's more likely concern about a defamation lawsuit.

One of the most difficult thing to prove per Michael McCann. Especially when the person you are sueing had the crap beaten out them over things the police had on record the plaintiff had demanded, and illegally tried to recover a few weeks before

 

[Deus Irae]

One of the most difficult thing to prove. Especially when the person you are sueing had the crap beaten out them over things the police had on record the plaintiff had demanded, and illegally tried to recover a few weeks before

The issue with defamation of a "celebrity" is almost never proof, which is not at all difficult, and proof would not be the issue here.

 

[LaterGator]

In looking at multiple documents there were several items that McCoy had demanded several times. They were demanded again during the attempted robbery, aggravated assault etc.

We know for a fact that aggravated assault occured.

Mc Coy had previously tried to remove items from the residence but were stopped by police when she noticed the attempt remotely on surveillance cameras. This was totally illegal. After that he had those cameras removed and installed a new system she did not have access to. ...Presumably the entry during the robbery/assault she would have not been able to secure the residence if someone in control enabled it, or of course if she had left it unlocked.

Sounds like a better case for definition, and all the reason for a pay out to stop this and attempt to revive Shady's career.