- Joined
- Mar 3, 2017
- Messages
- 6,769
- Reaction score
- 7,691
All sorts of things may have been discussed in this vale of tears. If the situation is this: teams are hoping by giving compensation in the form of equity to circumvent the cap scheme and the underlying agreement in the service of competitiveness which underlies and informs it and to which they have implicitly agreed, then those teams are acting in an obviously dishonorable manner. I would indeed have assumed such sleazeball nonsense would be rejected out of hand. I am of course prepared to be disappointed in the morality of my fellow man in such decadent times as these, but I would have thought this sort of thing - if I am understanding it right - would be clearly out of bounds for even the most morally obtuse among us.Not sure why you think it’s “obvious” that equity would come out of the cap as that has never been discussed when this concept has come out…or why you think my response is irrelevant considering your post was a response to my post about circumventing the cap….but don’t take my word for it. Here is an example of an article discussing the concept of cap circumvention :
No, Caleb Williams will NEVER get an NFL ownership stake in the draft
This rumor is absolutely impossible.www.sbnation.com
Last edited:











