How did I rank Brady in the 5-7 when I only listed four QB better than him? Opposed to just ranking him 8th which comes after 4th? Maybe I fell asleep that day in school when they taught counting to ten, but last time I checked that 5 comes right after 4. But hey, maybe this new math all the cool kids are doing these days have it in a different order. Again, I said he is 5-7 because I said there might be one or two other QBs that might be better than him and I have haven't kept track of the league. That is where 6th and 7th place might come in. Otherwise, he is 5th IMHO. One thing is for sure is that he is not top 3.
And thank you for making the argument I have been making all along which you seem to have a problem with me stating. Brady is clearly on the decline. But since he is falling for the tops of the top heights that no other QB has fallen from, but is still top of the second tier of QBs. Where is your beef with what I am saying.
All I have ever said is that he is not elite (You seem to agree), he is still better than 25-27 other QBs (you also seem to agree), and I don't think he is good enough to carry a bad offense by himself like he did in say 2006.