- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,878
- Reaction score
- 66,861
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.There was another cut with him, but I figured it was both more routine and a bit disjointed. However, since you've like him, let me share that one as well. I hope you like this one as you like the other.LOL. I like him.
There was another cut with him, but I figured it was both more routine and a bit disjointed. However, since you've like him, let me share that one as well. I hope you like this one as you like the other.
Yeah, those message boards are amazingly bad.Thanks. I appreciate all your posts related to the Bucs this off-season. Their message boards are awful so coming here is a great resource.
Maybe I am in the minority, but I am finding Gronk tiresome at best. The late retirement that likely deliberately screwed up the Jared Cook deal, coming back and ruining his trade value, and constant jabbing at the Pats. Thanks for the memories but he can go rot
Maybe I am in the minority, but I am finding Gronk tiresome at best. The late retirement that likely deliberately screwed up the Jared Cook deal, coming back and ruining his trade value, and constant jabbing at the Pats. Thanks for the memories but he can go rot
Thanks. I appreciate all your posts related to the Bucs this off-season. Their message boards are awful so coming here is a great resource.
Yeah, those message boards are amazingly bad.
Alex is absolutely a quack and I don’t believe for a second he has an original thought in his body BUT his willingness to try already known but never before used in this context methods of physical training to keep football players healthy clearly has merit. Traditional weight training and maxing out on squats twice a week isnt good for everyone. Sports science has advanced so incredibly far over the past half century but so much of football training still revolves around the principles established in the 60s if not earlier.
Not to throw **** right at the fan, but how exactly is he a quack?
The multiple player contracts with multiple voidable years in order to create cap space has never been used to this extreme previously. It's a strategy to circumvent the issue with the cap not rising as expected this year, due to lower than anticipated revenues.I’ve become convinced by the actions of both the Bucs and the Saints that the restrictions of the cap are not nearly as debilitating as we’ve been led to believe for the last 20 years.
Man. I can't believe people STILL believe this. The Pats could have signed Cook at any point in FA and did attempt to but as usual they were not willing to pay him to get him. Gronk hindered nothing. And even if his announcement came after FA, why in the world would Bill be waiting on him when he tried to trade him that very season? And on top, the TE position was completely void of talent outside of Gronk given we didn't have anything close to a #2 behind him so this notion that the Pats would have been fine going into 2019 with just Gronk, a player they were just trying to trade, and do NOTHING else at the position is pure fantasy and just feeds the excuse making machine that has become the Patriots the last year and a half.Maybe I am in the minority, but I am finding Gronk tiresome at best. The late retirement that likely deliberately screwed up the Jared Cook deal, coming back and ruining his trade value, and constant jabbing at the Pats. Thanks for the memories but he can go rot
Belichick himself has made that clear, both in word and deed.I’ve become convinced by the actions of both the Bucs and the Saints that the restrictions of the cap are not nearly as debilitating as we’ve been led to believe for the last 20 years.
I’ve become convinced by the actions of both the Bucs and the Saints that the restrictions of the cap are not nearly as debilitating as we’ve been led to believe for the last 20 years.
The multiple player contracts with multiple voidable years in order to create cap space has never been used to this extreme previously. It's a strategy to circumvent the issue with the cap not rising as expected this year, due to lower than anticipated revenues.
In my opinion it is a smart maneuver by Tampa Bay, in order to maximize an opportunity for more championships that has a relatively short window.
New Orleans leveraging the future does not make sense to me though. They are maybe a nine-win team, a borderline top-ten NFL at best. To me they would have been better off bottoming out and regrouping for 2022, rather than continuing to charge on their credit card. The Saints kicked the can down the road by restructuring $52 million in contracts, cap money that is being diverted for a year or two. Even with that they still had to release, trade or not re-sign eight players in order to save another $40 million on the cap. The salary cap had real consequences for them this offseason.
Pittsburgh is another team that used voidable years to get under the cap, yet still lost multiple players due to the cap.
If the cap increases dramatically the next couple years then teams using voidable years will have won that bet; if not then their situations will be even worse than it was before. While the NFL did sign big broadcasting rights contracts recently, last year's revenue shortfall will still be spread out over two more seasons.
Using voidable years to lower the current cap just seems like a very risky business strategy to me. And even if the cap goes up enough that a team can cover next year's cap acceleration, it will still give them fewer cap dollars to spend in 2022 than a team that did not use this tactic. That in turn will mean said club has less money to re-sign their own players than other teams, and less money to sign other free agents.
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 3 - April 18 (Through 26yrs)











