ThatllMoveTheChains!!!
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2011
- Messages
- 2,220
- Reaction score
- 1,670
Much like most of the moves by the NFLPA this was stupid. They signed away their right to pursue legal action, but it doesn't change that without a binding CBA it was illegal.No it isn't. You can say it but that don't make it true.
It wasn't a backroom, illegal agreement. The owners knew they were going to put this in the new CBA, the players knew they were going to put this in the new CBA, the 2 sides negotiated the issue, the owners made a concession to put it in the new CBA, and David Doty ruled the whole thing was legal.
That's one of the huge benefits of sports CBAs: To take things like collusion and market limitations, which are typically illegal, and make them perfectly legal because they are collectively bargained on and agreed to by the owners and players.
Judge Rejects NFLPA's Collusion Lawsuit Against The NFL Alleging Secret Salary Cap - SportsBusiness Daily | SportsBusiness Journal | SportsBusiness Daily Global
However, as part of the settlement of the lockout, the NFLPA agreed to dismiss all “unknown claims.” The union contended it had been duped into the concession and it should be allowed to sue. “This is precisely the danger in releasing 'unknown' claims -- a danger the NFLPA recognized and decided was worth the risk in order to settle,” Judge Michael Davis wrote in a 28-page decision.
While you can write up a document that absolves you of the ramifications of prior actions it doesn't make them legal at the time. This is literally the same tomfoolery that the league used to punish the Patriots.











