- Joined
- Mar 27, 2008
- Messages
- 30,865
- Reaction score
- 29,555
I don't think Montana is the equivalent of Bradshaw - the comparison was only to the point of being able to keep a roster together for years and years back then.
Through draft and trade, the dynasty teams of the 70's, 80's, 90's had rosters that were absolutely stacked - the QB was nowhere near as dominant as they are now with the new rules. Different game.
Montana is #2 on my list if I go top 10. Bradshaw isn't on it.
Alright, I see what you're saying. If I'm building a franchise, I would take Brady at QB over anyone. If I need a QB to win the super bowl tomorrow, and both are in their primes, I would flip a coin between Montana and Brady. No other QBs come into the discussion.
Last edited: