Uptown
Standin' Pat
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2016
- Messages
- 18,788
- Reaction score
- 38,895
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'll take Mahomes running all day.
Thus the issue. Hasn't played since a couple days after X-masWatkins is capable. That is if he isn't injured by the half.
That's high standards lol.
I have no doubt he will. Misdirection, end runs, etc. That Waffle House laminated menu of plays is in the 1000sHe can get the ball out quick though.
Reid will scheme up a way to counter the Bucs front. He always does.
yeah a back to back is impressive......but not even close to a dynasty.......don't need to see 20 years of sustained success, but every one after the second gets more and more impressive and a lot harder to sustain
(i think the 2nd is an accomplishment, but having been there helps.....)
to me a dynasty is about the ability to sustain success, to be able to reload/retool without missing a beat
the road to the lombardi went through foxboro for 20 years.......and it's not over yet, this is just a blip
Yes and a afccg loss in 2013Would you consider the 2014-2018 Pats a dynasty?
No back to back.
SB win
AFC title Game loss
SB win
SB loss
SB win
Who cares. He's been a better poster than Biffins.All the chiefs players are capable, Mahomes doesn't need an offensive line because he's Bolt with an arm, the game will be over by the 1st quarter. This guy is not here for conversation. You have all been had. This is a troll job of epic proportions and I hope you stay true to your word and come back should you lose because there are many ways your team can lose.