Fixit
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2006
- Messages
- 7,666
- Reaction score
- 7,390
I never said anything about making a perfect form, wrap-up tackle every time. I said that people who think this rule all of a sudden means that defenders won't be able to tackle need to turn on a game where it happens routinely.Because the safety position has to make a split second decision when tackling a lot of times and there isn't a whole lot of room for thinking about a wrap-up tackle. Another poster used Ebner as an example to you before. The safety's primary job, once the ball has been secured, is to bring the receiver down by any means that he has necessary to him. A lot of times, that doesn't constitute making a perfect form, wrap-up tackle. A lot of times, trying to do so will cause the receiver to shed the tackle and have nothing but daylight in front of him. So the league is essentially going to punish this position because it has to make split second decisions for the good of the team. That's not to say anything about the disparity of the calls for guys lowering their helmets to tackle vs. a RB lowering his helmet before trying to truck a tackler or a blocker lowering his helmet out of a three point stance. The rule is a terrible one. That's par for the course in Goodell's administration.
I'm by no means a big fan of this rule, but defenders have no one to blame but themselves for it existing.