Bruins29
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2010
- Messages
- 8,006
- Reaction score
- 10,632
Probably. Plus you figure if that dynamic changed the Pats would not be playing from behind trying to get quick strikes instead of long sustained drives. Longer offensive drives would mean the D would have gotten much more rest....not that it even may of helped.Optics of 42-27 make it look like the Pats got run out of the building like 41-14 but really when you break it down despite not playing anywhere near their best there is some stuff you look at and wonder like if Brady gets the ball to White before stepping over the LOS Pats go up 31-21 which even if the Hunt TD happens it is 31-28 but the Pats aren't forced into going for it on 4th and 1 which changed field position which helped the Chiefs on their TD that made it 35-27.
Hightower went out when it was 21-17, 2 plays later Chiefs punt.
Pats score 24-21 Pats.
Chiefs drive, Chiefs punt
Pats drive it to the 4 and then lose 6 yards on a pitch to White. Then Brady throws it a yard past the line which if he had better awareness he could have thrown it earlier and White would have walked in. Settle for a FG. Pats 27-21
Chiefs drive, they realize Hightower is out and Marsh is in and Hunt has the hot hand so they attack that area and kudos to them it worked out 80 yard TD Chiefs 28-27
Pats drive, Go for it on 4th and 1 at the 40, stopped
Chiefs drive, 3 and out
Pats drive, this is where the 4th and 1 stop field position comes in. Pats start that drive from the 13 and it stalls at the 29. Pats punt
Chiefs drive, start from their 45 eventually go 55 yards and get a TD 35-27
You just wonder if Brady gets back behind the LOS and gets it to White if it leads to a different outcome.
But when you think about it, the Pats ended up like all the other teams they have pulled ahead of and ended up playing from behind, stalling out and gassing their D. We have done it to teams many times.