- Joined
- Mar 27, 2008
- Messages
- 30,875
- Reaction score
- 29,559
They'll need evidence of that to present to a court of law otherwise it will get thrown out of court.
Sure, an affidavit from a police officer would do the trick.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.They'll need evidence of that to present to a court of law otherwise it will get thrown out of court.
Of course it’s legal because they went to a judge and priced probably cause.I think you're wrong. Crimes are committed in changing rooms. Crimes are committed in massage parlors. Crimes are committed in bathroom stalls. Not everyone that uses those places commits a crime. If I were recorded on camera in any of those places I would file a criminal complaint against them. They are recording undressed people whether they are breaking the law or not. That cant be legal, can it?
Right, but what purpose does releasing the video serve after the accused admits they did the crime?
We're told that will be part of what happens next.
This is where the public shaming comes in to effect.
And that's where the local law enforcement community gets to show off the trophy they bagged.
In essence it's political theater, a display of realpolitik in action.
There was a long running investigation that led to this arrest. The evidence if a crime being committed that allowed the cameras to be placed was the rampant prostitution going on there.That sounds very NWO dystopian of you.. the evidence you speak of was what? Entering the legal tax paying establishment? He hugged her upon entering and leaving. What if they were friends and she found it kinky. Then your 'crime' is not solicitation, it is indecent ejaculation outside of home or hotel. This is why escorts are legal throughout our land, if you want to talk legality.
No. Probable cause is all that is necessary. If someone has a crack pipe in a public bathroom and a cop hears and smells the action he/she has probable cause to investigate visually.Right, with a warrant
I don't agree. Moving on.False, brother. Dozens of johns and prosties arrested, charged and convicted daily in this country without any video of sexual acts being performed. It's blatantly obvious that the motive to film these sessions was done to embarrass the johns. Hence, the apparent forthcoming and totally unnecessary release of the Kraft video inside the massage room.
All lawyers tell you "yes" after you ask them "can we win this?" After you lose the legal battle and lots of money, lawyers say "I could have won that one"No he looks like someone who was smart and listened to lawyers
I agree that the videos are valuable evidence in any trial, but why compromise an investigation by releasing video evidence before the trial even starts? It's terrible procedure to release the video before any trial and to me it smacks of gamesmanship in an attemot to force the defendents to plead guilty or make a plea bargain of some kind.I don't agree. Moving on.
All lawyers tell you "yes" after you ask them "can we win this?" After you lose the legal battle and lots of money, lawyers say "I could have won that one"
Kraft is getting terrible legal advice.
He should have not denied anything and kept quuet. He should go on TV in NE and confess his mistake to the people and Patriots fans and ask for forgiveness. Admit that his actions have harmed the treatment of women. He shaned the franchise, NFL and Pat's fans around the world. He has expected others to adhere to a higher standard that he has failed to live up to. Get it on video and circulating around the country like his face is right now.
I agree that the videos are valuable evidence in any trial, but why compromise an investigation by releasing video evidence before the trial even starts? It's terrible procedure to release the video before any trial and to me it smacks of gamesmanship in an attemot to force the defendents to plead guilty or make a plea bargain of some kind.
So showing his face at a pre-Oscars party the night after this news broke was a bad look for BK?
A lot of those arrests come from sting operations; i.e. a police officer poses as a prostitute (or a john) and says "this person solicited me for sex." Other are actually caught in the act at the moment it takes place. There are light years of difference between those situations and getting evidence when the sex act is taking place behind closed doors in a business establishment where the obvious defense is going to be "hey, nothing happened beyond a massage."False, brother. Dozens of johns and prosties arrested, charged and convicted daily in this country without any video of sexual acts being performed. It's blatantly obvious that the motive to film these sessions was done to embarrass the johns. Hence, the apparent forthcoming and totally unnecessary release of the Kraft video inside the massage room.
It's been 4 days. Let your legal team do it's thing. Once they are done he can then go ahead and make his public statements and take any action to clean up his name he feels is needed.All lawyers tell you "yes" after you ask them "can we win this?" After you lose the legal battle and lots of money, lawyers say "I could have won that one"
Kraft is getting terrible legal advice.
He should have not denied anything and kept quuet. He should go on TV in NE and confess his mistake to the people and Patriots fans and ask for forgiveness. Admit that his actions have harmed the treatment of women. He shaned the franchise, NFL and Pat's fans around the world. He has expected others to adhere to a higher standard that he has failed to live up to. Get it on video and circulating around the country like his face is right now.
but why compromise an investigation by releasing video evidence before the trial even starts?
A lot of those arrests come from sting operations; i.e. a police officer poses as a prostitute (or a john) and says "this person solicited me for sex." Other are actually caught in the act at the moment it takes place. There are light years of difference between those situations and getting evidence when the sex act is taking place behind closed doors in a business establishment where the obvious defense is going to be "hey, nothing happened beyond a massage."
I agree the release of the video is unnecessary and I doubt it will be officially released. By whether or not it leaks is yet to be determined.
My conspiracy theory is the do want to manipulate public opinion but not by embarassing the johns but making the Feds look indifferent towards to the issue by sitting on their hands and not picking up the lead on the case while women are exploited and enslavedI agree that the videos are valuable evidence in any trial, but why compromise an investigation by releasing video evidence before the trial even starts? It's terrible procedure to release the video before any trial and to me it smacks of gamesmanship in an attemot to force the defendents to plead guilty or make a plea bargain of some kind.
| 20 | 2K |
| 58 | 8K |
| 0 | 1K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 9 - April 24 (Through 26yrs)











