Soliel
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2017
- Messages
- 4,821
- Reaction score
- 5,577
Is it naive to think a racist cop framed OJ?
Hard to call.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Is it naive to think a racist cop framed OJ?
What about putting cameras in changing rooms to prevent retail theft. I think there definitely is an implied expectation of privacy when in a massage room. Some people are going there for an actual massage and have their junk on the Jupiter PD database. Too much freedom > too little... can't allow modern technology to trampede on basic rightsUnfortunately, I and millions of other people now know $h!+ about Robert Kraft. And equating a sleazy massage parlor and someone's bedroom as similar places with expectations of privacy is, as I have said, foolish.
Report: Kraft not expected to dispute chargesLet me ask you something, he is facing up to a year in jail, would you walk in there without a lawyer? If the answer is no and you were paying the lawyer, would you listen to him? If so, then everything you just said is nonsense. No lawyer is going to tell you to cop to it.
How can I put this diplomatically? As men, sometimes, many of us think with the little brain instead of the big brain..........We may all have been guilty of this as some times during our lives. Maybe not to spa/prostitution extent, but doing things that in retrospect weren't the smartest.....I agree, incredibly naive
Yes it isIs it naive to think a racist cop framed OJ?
Yes they doDo racist cops exist?
Being a racist does not prove you framed a particular person. The evidence was blatantly obvious, and he has essentially admitted he killed her since.Was Fuhman racist?
YesYes... Does temperature affect ball air pressure?
This is where you are a moron. The evidence proves innocence.Yes..... but do we then ignore all the other evidence and use those singular facts to declare innocence?
Wrong. Pats fans invested themselves in learning the facts. The OJ jury did a Rodney king make up.The OJ jury did and 99% of Pats fans did...we believe what we want to believe.
There was evidence of a crime being committed. You do not have a right to privacy when breaking the law.What about putting cameras in changing rooms to prevent retail theft. I think there definitely is an implied expectation of privacy when in a massage room. Some people are going there for an actual massage and have their junk on the Jupiter PD database. Too much freedom > too little... can't allow modern technology to trampede on basic rights
Yes please officers lock me up for 120 days without me using a lawyer to defend myself. I'm kind of sick of the self righteous in this thread.I am kind of sick of people always denying the things that they do wrong. When did we become a society of cowards who hide our misdeeds and mistakes? I suppose we've always been that, but it does piss me off.
I've lived my entire life taking responsibility for my mistakes and being truthful at every opportunity. It annoys me to all hell that Kraft would just deny this when there is video evidence. This is the wrong example to set for fans and for Americans in general. Too often, the first move a guilty person makes is to cover up and deny. We need to be better than that.
Isnt it worse to do whatever you want knowingly and thrn when you get caught pull a phony act of being contrite?I am kind of sick of people always denying the things that they do wrong. When did we become a society of cowards who hide our misdeeds and mistakes? I suppose we've always been that, but it does piss me off.
Kraft is worried about public relations and sadly about 1/3 people will believe his denial because they like him.I've lived my entire life taking responsibility for my mistakes and being truthful at every opportunity. It annoys me to all hell that Kraft would just deny this when there is video evidence. This is the wrong example to set for fans and for Americans in general. Too often, the first move a guilty person makes is to cover up and deny. We need to be better than that.
I think you're wrong. Crimes are committed in changing rooms. Crimes are committed in massage parlors. Crimes are committed in bathroom stalls. Not everyone that uses those places commits a crime. If I were recorded on camera in any of those places I would file a criminal complaint against them. They are recording undressed people whether they are breaking the law or not. That cant be legal, can it?There was evidence of a crime being committed. You do not have a right to privacy when breaking the law.
There was evidence of a crime being committed. You do not have a right to privacy when breaking the law.
Changing rooms, massage parlors and public restrooms are not private places- they are public places.I think you're wrong. Crimes are committed in changing rooms. Crimes are committed in massage parlors. Crimes are committed in bathroom stalls. Not everyone that uses those places commits a crime. If I were recorded on camera in any of those places I would file a criminal complaint against them. They are recording undressed people whether they are breaking the law or not. That cant be legal, can it?
An escort who has sex with his/her paying client is by law a prostitute.That sounds very NWO dystopian of you.. the evidence you speak of was what? Entering the legal tax paying establishment? He hugged her upon entering and leaving. What if they were friends and she found it kinky. Then your 'crime' is not solicitation, it is indecent ejaculation outside of home or hotel. This is why escorts are legal throughout our land, if you want to talk legality.
Yes please officers lock me up for 120 days without me using a lawyer to defend myself. I'm kind of sick of the self righteous in this thread.
Why do they have doors?Changing rooms, massage parlors and public restrooms are not private places- they are public places.
Changing rooms, massage parlors and public restrooms are not private places- they are public places.
Or was it because he was trying to lose weight??? I’ll just repeat, we often believe what we want to believe. I will say that the key stone cop investigation did help with being able to more plausibly deny, which makes us feel better. OJ was not guilty in criminal court either.
Changing rooms, massage parlors and public restrooms are not private places- they are public places.
The same federal appeals court that decided Hill had earlier held, in the 1989 case of United States v. White, that people do have a reasonable expectation of privacy in being shielded from view by the privacy partitions in a public restroom.
Importantly, however, the court has also said that a reasonable privacy expectation is different in a public restroom from what it would be in a home. This is at least in part because in the former, it is understood that users will be expected eventually to surrender their respective stalls to others.
All of this makes good sense. A public restroom is not a permanent abode into which a customer can simply enter and stay indefinitely. On the other hand, it also seems wrong to say that some people have no reasonable expectation of privacy in the restroom.
To evaluate the court's approach to public restrooms, let us now turn to the facts that -- in the judges' estimation -- eliminated Hill's right to privacy in the bathroom.
They are in the yellow pages, because it's legal.An escort who has sex with his/her paying client is by law a prostitute.
| 20 | 2K |
| 58 | 8K |
| 0 | 1K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 6 - April 21 (Through 26yrs)











