- Joined
- Sep 15, 2004
- Messages
- 35,866
- Reaction score
- 29,654
He was there on Jan 19th and again on the morning of Jan 20th?
He may be able to get an endorsement deal for those little blue pills.
He had a coupon that was going to expire.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He was there on Jan 19th and again on the morning of Jan 20th?
He may be able to get an endorsement deal for those little blue pills.
OK so now we know Kraft paid the worker at least 100$ in cash in the room after the tug and in addition to the massage fee he paid up front when he first came into the establishment.
He never used a credit card.
They have him on camera paying for rub and tug.
Its an open and shut case. Lawyers will make it as painless as possible, but his reputtauional damage is permanent.
Guessing the video shows the up front but the extra $100 is off camera?No
Now we know what is being alleged, which is not the same thing as knowing what happened.
OK so now we know Kraft paid the worker at least 100$ in cash in the room after the tug and in addition to the massage fee he paid up front when he first came into the establishment.
He never used a credit card.
They have him on camera paying for rub and tug.
Its an open and shut case. Lawyers will make it as painless as possible, but his reputtauional damage is permanent.
Doesn’t make it right to subject a young girl to it.World’s oldest profession. And many, due to life circumstances, do choose to do it.
Guessing the video shows the up front but the extra $100 is off camera?
OK so now we know Kraft paid the worker at least 100$ in cash in the room after the tug and in addition to the massage fee he paid up front when he first came into the establishment.
He never used a credit card.
They have him on camera paying for rub and tug.
Its an open and shut case. Lawyers will make it as painless as possible, but his reputtauional damage is permanent.
Impressive beard, how old is it?
“Dating a sugar daddy” isn’t jerking him off for $10.Actually, there are plenty. Just look at any sugar dating website.
No
Now we know what is being alleged, which is not the same thing as knowing what happened.
Yes OK that is what is alleged and he has not yet been formally proven guilty.
What is the likelihood that they made all this up against a billionaire and also categorically state that they have video proof?
This is a Patriots discussion board, not the NY times.
Morally but not legally.I think a lot of people are missing the point here.
There are 3 people involved here.
1) The sex traffickers
2) The sex worker
3) Kraft
The problem is that both the sex trafficker and possibly Kraft have victimized the worker if true. It doesn't matter what the law says and it doesn't matter if Kraft was unaware. The fact that he did it to what may have been a sex slave, means she was victimized again at the hands of the Patriots owner. It's not a good look.
By trivializing Kraft's role in this, the victim is dehumanized again. The fact is that he may have unwillingly participated in the victimization of a victim of sex trafficking for his own gratification. If he did, and he was unaware, he should be just as shocked she was a sex slave and should cooperate fully and not try and cover his ass. By trying to beat the charges and deny it, if true, he shows little regard for her pain when it comes to his reputation. Let's just hope it's a case of mistaken identity.
What do you mean by many here are ignoring their own sins?Of course it is not right. And it is a crime. But many here are ignoring their own “sins” when trying to hold Kraft responsible for how the girls came to be there. Because they prefer to not think about that.
I do not think that defense will work with a judge.
Just need Lavar Ball to weigh in.Im blaming him for the whole thing to begin with.
I do not think that defense will work with a judge.
100 dollar tip just conicidentally given immediately after rub and tug. Pretty strong circumstantial evidence,.
How can you expect a team that didn’t fight back when they were innocent to fight back when they are guilty?That's completely unfair they didnt take picks from Irsay or the Cleveland Browns owner.
If they take picks away this team needs to FIGHT BACK against the NFL as much as we can.
It would be ridiculous and set a complete we are punishing the team fans and not their perverted owner.
| 20 | 2K |
| 58 | 8K |
| 0 | 1K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 5 - April 20 (Through 26yrs)











