- Joined
- Mar 19, 2006
- Messages
- 34,873
- Reaction score
- 15,423
You are right Ken even if some of the fans dont want to hear it because they love this romantic story of how amazingly selfless Brady is even when it comes to contracts.
In reality Brady was clever enough to realize how BB deals with players that keep negotiating for market setting deals even as they get older. He conceded some -- ultimately irrelevant (what are 20m over his career for someone who made as much as Brady) -- money to make sure that he would always end up on the right end of the BB value equation so he could continue doing what he loves in an environment that gave him the best shot at competing every year.
Acknowledging this puzzle piece doesnt mean he is less of a leader or competitor. It just shows that a chance at rings was at a higher priority than a few dozen millions over the length of his career.
I can see both sides.
Mostly, when the "selfish" players get all the press attention for insisting on the best possible deal they can possibly get, the justifying narrative tends to be that this is how they are treated, "it's a business," blah blah blah, and we always get reminded that yes, he's a multi-millionaire (generally an available state of affairs even for 3rd string O-linemen, if they have any longevity), but the club owner is a billionaire.
So we get in our heads that everybody wrings every dollar out of every deal.... and we get in our heads that if they outperform, every athlete announces they will sit for months at the beginning of the season if the deal isn't re-negotiated... "just the nature of the beast."
Up-front money, & 2 negotiating parties that will stick to the deal, has been gold in this situation. But you have to admit, it means that both sides always take a "leap of faith." Credit Brady, but credit Pats management too. In retrospect... it's turned out great to have Jimmy G out of the building. Brady thrives on competition, but more than most he is one who accepts that mgt. and labor have to "collaborate" in his/the Pats situation, because they're aligned on the goal of winning. It's an interesting (possible) downside of position competition in a special situation... what does it do to the stability of the ongoing "deal" b/w Brady and Patriots management?
But that sidetrack aside, I cant believe how good the Brady situation has been for the league. Think about the implied message: the "me-me-me, I value my self-worth by my contract" tendency might be much more prevalent without a high profile guy saying, "how about if my GDP would only place 40th among the nations of the world... but we get a chance to win a Super Bowl?"
So yeah, it is good that Brady's able to do this... "Just get the business end over with, the winning stuff is hard enough to do without business in the way."
I think it's worth a little appreciation from us fans but maybe not the over-the-moon drooling.
Does anybody think Brady couldn't say "let's renegotiate" after the last SB he won? Does anybody think he gets to do that EVERY time he does something like win a SB?
So yeah he's just honoring front-loaded deals. He stops doing that, he stops getting front-loaded deals. The trust shatters, he's just another shlub you have to play hardball with.
But I think we can be a little happy that Kraft/Beli/Brady are in alignment.











