So what set you off on this crusade? Did Caldwell hire you to become his publicist?
Did Caldwell key your car?
I have a freaking opinion. Deal with it.
Considering that Caldwell was the Pats de facto #1 receiver in the regular season of 2006 and that there are only 32 #1 receivers in the NFL, then yes 40th in total receiving yardage is rather mediocre. Or do I need to provide you with some math lessons?
Watson.
I wouldn't consider Caldwell a "#1" WR by any stretch of the imagination. I wouldn't consider Branch one, either. Let's reserve that title for Ward, Holt, Fitzgerald, Burress, Johnson, etc.
Why not, because you said so? He's come off a mediocre season statistically that also happened to be his career high. He needs to prove that he is not a "one year wonder" and can continue the limited success that he has enjoyed so far in the Pats system. AND more importantly he will be facing tougher competition than ever for a roster spot in 2007 or do you maintain the position that the guys BB just brought in are scrubs and have no chance to unseat Caldwell?
For a #2/3 WR - that's ALL the Patriots have in their system - his stats were pretty damn good.
Welker isn't going to unseat Caldwell. They play two different positions.
Stallworth was brought in to start alongside Caldwell.
Washington was brought in simply to prove himself in the NFL. He has barely shown anything so far in his career.
VJCPatriot said:
You are the one inserting the flames graphics implying that I'm asking to burn Caldwell at the stake. That is certainly a theatrical response to me DARING to suggest that Caldwell actually needs to prove himself in training camp. Excuse me but unlike yourself I do not consider Caldwell to be a solid gold, put it in cement on the hollywood walk of fame, lock for this roster.
He'll have to prove himself to be a starter, but he's beyond having to prove himself to be on the roster (save a total meltdown).
VJCPatriot said:
I maintain my right to disagree. Sorry but your word is not gospel. Whether or not Caldwell makes the team is debateable. Please try not to get your panties all up in a bunch because in the end it is BB that will make an informed decision on whether or not to cut Caldwell after a full training camp, not you, not me, nor any other poster here.
Feel free to debate on why Caldwell shouldn't be a starter. You can keep back tracking to "BB will decide it" but that doesn't change anything.
Caldwell has shown (to date) that he can be the #2 starter on the New England Patriots, and produce with decent numbers, especially for his role.
I'd say Givens had Caldwell's role from 2002 to 2005. And Givens NEVER had more catches than Caldwell.