Try to grasp a simple concept here. I have been defending the Patriots about Spygate from the beginning. I have been saying that they didn't cheat. I have been saying that they should have gotten only very minor punishment. I have been saying that Goodell has been an incompetent and should not be the Commissioner.
However, the facts are clear. The Patriots were found guilty of wrongdoing by the only person who has the power to make such a determination in the NFL. People are wondering if what the Patriots did taints their Super Bowl victories. A senator of the United States is looking into the situation.
The notion that it should be acceptable to defend Belichick by making moronic personal attacks upon Dungy because his child had problems and eventually took his own life is an embarrassment, and the people who make such attacks are scumbags.
Let me start by saying that I hope you are not implying that I am one of the people making comments about his sons suicide. I have never done that. But if others want to do it to prove that he hasn't had his priorities straight in the past, then thats their perogative.
I was not making moronic personal attacks on Dungy. I was pointed out certain facts about Dungys own coaching staff, front office and whoever is in charge of the Audio/Video ,that have come to light, but never had the intense spotlight shown on them that our act has.
This response by you makes alot more sense, but if you take a step back and read your past posts, you will see how you're comments are coming across.
And as for you pointing out that it was serious enough for a senator to be looking into.... come ooonnnnnnnnn, are you serious? Did you even read that or think about it before yout typed it. It is NOT serious enough for a senator to be looking into. This guy has been criticized by Pats fans and Pats haters alike, for getting involved in something he has no business in. Unless you consider that a few of his business constituants ARE involved in it (i.e comcast, etc.) as well as his favorite team being one of the teams we beat in the superbowl. If its not about his special interests, then why is he not going after the Panthers for having a bunch of their players turn up dirty on steroids, when they beat the eagles in the NFCCG? How would it look if a Massachusetts senator stepped up and wanted punishment against the Yankees for them using steroids while beating the Red Sox? He, and by extension the whole state, would look foolish. And, before you start an argument over who does and does not use steroids in baseball... I don't care. I was just using that as an example.
Lets also not dismiss the am ount of facetime this guy is getting in all mediums while he attacks the Pats. He
is selling a book remember? If he didn't go after the Pats publicly, the who the hell would know who this guy is? Nontheless buy his book? This guy needed to be recognizable to the rest of america, and what better way to do that than to attack the evil football empire known as the New England Patriots? I bet half the people in his own state had no idea who he was.... forget about nationally.
You started off making sense, but when you make that Spectre comment, you look like an idiot. :bricks:
