Off The Grid
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2010
- Messages
- 9,153
- Reaction score
- 4,341
I think Brown will help here.
This is where losing High hurts.
Losing a High always hurts.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I think Brown will help here.
This is where losing High hurts.
Not to thread hijack but I find it interesting that Brady is a big Elon Musk fan on Instagram.
He is much better than rjf
and than the 2017 version of branch
and would be an upgrade over guy
or butler when they play inside also.
Valentine was as good as Mitchell last year in his role.
As far as I'm concerned Malcolm does not exist until I see him on the field. He's been hurt since he got her. I expect nothing from him. Anything we get is a pleasant, unexpected surprise. Done thinking about him.
If Valentine could generate any sort of pass-rush, I'd agree with him being the priority. So for now, I think Mitchell might be better, since Dorsett has been a disappointment so far (0 catches since his first game)
No has mentioned but Ricky Jean-Francois had a good game against Oakland.
He made one gorgeous clothesline tackle and was generally holding his own against a good OL (although I think they were with a few subs). For a non-starter, he's above average IMO.
Malcolm should return soon, too so they can keep the players fresh with a nice 3 men rotation(And that doesn't include A.Butler and Flowers, who sometimes line as DT.)
“holy mackerel“ Dorsett sighting..
btw - Dorsett does get open . like w Allen its not (all) on him .
if you'd be a QB and you had one of Cooks, Gronk, Hogan, Dola, White open play after play and then Dorsett as well - who would you go to?
if you'd be OC and had Gronk, Cooks, Dola, White, Burk available besides Dorsett (or any late addition WR) who would you scheme for first read?
Rooting for the Pats is like watching the Walking Dead.
Not being able to stay in nickel as a base vs running teams worries me.If VV is 100% no question. If hes 80% is a toss up.
Yea Branch this year has been a disappointment. VV needs to be 100% for this to be fact.
I think Guy has been pretty good vs the run this year. VV is more stout no question.
I like him but I tend to agree VV at 90% would be an upgraded on the run D over Butler
Tough to compare but no question they both had very good rookie years.
You are slowly convincing me VV would be the more prudent selection.
He is scheduled to be evaluated this week and is "getting better, for sure," according to someone close to him and familiar with his progress. Whether that progress results in him being the player designated to return from IR will ultimately be up to the team.
Not being able to stay in nickel as a base vs running teams worries me.
The biggest strength of this defense is the secondary which is among the few best in the NFL. But no secondary can be effective with only 4 dbs any more.
So if we stay in nickel and ar constantly facing 2nd and 4 or 5 Abdullah’s 3rd and 2 or 3 it stresses the defense. If we go to 43 to combat that we are susceptible to TE/slot/rb passes in first down.
Defense is often a House of cards. If one piece craps out it affects everything.
I’d rather have brady throwing more to RBs and TEs than find out we can’t deend the run in nickel. So far this year that has been the biggest lingering worry I’ve had.
Whether or not VV is needed much more than MM depends entirely on what exactly the story is with Hogan.
It's much harder to plug an off-the-street WR into the NE offensive system than to plug an off-the-street DL into the NE defensive system.
As I think about it more, you are 100% correct that VV is the better choice.
I don't want to be too overconfident but as long as they play their game the Pats are going to the Super Bowl.
In that SB they will play either NO or Philly. Both teams have strong running games and very good passing offenses.
vs those teams it is CRITICAL NE stays in nickel and stop the run w 5 and sometimes 6 in the box.
Best for rookies, but it doesnt mean it's good... And since that, he managed to get 0 additional sacks throughout the whole season. He is very slow, even Adam Butler can get to the backfield faster
Valentine can't generate pass-rush consistently. He'd be a rotational, 300lbs pound Run Stuffing Lineman that is recovering from an knee injury. Even if he came back, I seriouslyquestion how much production we would got.
Odd comment that a 320lb DT can’t “generate a pass rush consistently” since such a player has never existed.Best for rookies, but it doesnt mean it's good... And since that, he managed to get 0 additional sacks throughout the whole season. He is very slow, even Adam Butler can get to the backfield faster
Valentine can't generate pass-rush consistently. He'd be a rotational, 300lbs pound Run Stuffing Lineman that is recovering from an knee injury. Even if he came back, I seriouslyquestion how much production we would got.
Some folks do not appreciate they are completely different players. If healthy and playing his best, VV markedly improves the interior DL. He has a rare combination of size and speed.week 11
AFCCG
V. Valentine: 6'4, 329, 5'19, 1.77 (combine)
Adam Butler: 6'4, 293, 5'23, 1.82 (pro day)
VALENTINE
Combine Invite: Yes
Height: 6035
Weight: 329
40 Yrd Dash: 5.19
20 Yrd Dash: 2.99
10 Yrd Dash: 1.77 225 Lb. Bench Reps: 17
Vertical Jump: 29
Broad Jump: 09'02"
20 Yrd Shuttle: 4.59
3-Cone Drill: 8.03
A.BUTLER
Height: 6037
Weight: 293
40 Yrd Dash: 5.23
20 Yrd Dash: 2.94
10 Yrd Dash: 1.82 225 Lb. Bench Reps: 23
Vertical Jump: 28 1/2
Broad Jump: 08'05"
20 Yrd Shuttle: 4.90
3-Cone Drill: 7.51
I promise you that neither he nor anyone of value has every spared a thought for you.
Sweet God, what a wretched, dark, miserable existence you must lead.
Wow.
You'ave gotta be the saddest, most miserable Soul on this Planet.
How can being a Patriots Fan be anything but a source of incalculable joy???
Good luck.