Ring 6
PatsFans.com Supporter
PatsFans.com Supporter
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
2022 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 72,618
- Reaction score
- 22,468
There needs to be evidence to arrest someone.Anything is possible, Andy; but I would imagine that if the D.A.'s office wanted someone to sign the warrant they probably wouldn't have that hard of a time.
The media makes things up all the time, even if by misunderstanding.On top of that, it would be a major no-no for them to use the prospect of "making up" a warrant out of nowhere.
I'm not really sure there is such a thing as a 'paper warrant'. It makes no sense to me, you either have a warrant for someones arrest or you do not. Thatwas my point,this euphamism must mean something, and perhaps it is that they applied for a warrant and were rebuffed.A paper warrant that is held by the lead detective/shot caller is one thing; that happens all the time, especially in cases where they desire more important information.
Its rumor, we don't know who tampered with it, or if there is anyway to prove it, or what AH said when asked about it."Making up" a warrant out of thin air would be something altogether different, but like I said--anything is possible in any situation, so nothing would surprise me anymore.
One thing to keep in mind is that our version of tampering/destroying those items may actually be different than what the reality was, so in that regard you could be correct.
AgreeAs Deus stated, there are several very important factors they'd have to prove to be able to get that charge to stick, so to speak; and being on a big stage can sometimes make borderline decisions a bit different than in regular circumstances. They may not want to take a shot with circumstantial evidence or a weak case for the OOJ charge and then lose.
We just don't know, and that is another example of what we don't.Another important thing to determine is whether they'd be charges in the state of Mass. or federal charges of OOJ, because I don't believe that all OOJ charges are felonies in the state setting, although I'm not sure of the specifics in this instance obviously. They may not feel that charging him with OOJ in a state setting that isn't a felony would be worth it--especially if he has indeed cooperated on any level whatsoever. They aren't trying to solve an OOJ case obviously, as their murder case is the certain top priority. If they feel that AH can be of any service to them whatsoever now or in the future (and we don't know if he has helped or not), then the common sense choice would be not to charge him with something that is a 1st/2nd degree misdemeanor.
And I think the point is that the arrest warrant issue, and arrest imminent was poor reporting.It'd be a waste of time and also a waste of a possible helpful resource in the sense that it's at least better than what they may have, even if his cooperation has been limited to this point.












