- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Messages
- 40,022
- Reaction score
- 45,673
Reed was a starter on a pretty good defense and was cut because of the surprisingly quick development of a rookie coupled with the fact that he bad mouthed the coaching staff. You yourself have made this point. So yeah, for depth purposes, saying that Reed is likely to be a better option than Harmon going forward isn't a reach.
Reed had 150 more snaps than Harmon on the season in which he achieved 0 interceptions, 0 passes defended and was making 2 tackles a game. I'm not sure that just being on the field qualifies him as offering more.
I thought that's where you were going to go with it, personally. The INT's were the #1 thing people were harping on with Wilson last season.
Why would you have thought that. I spend most of my time in the draft forum, as you know,. Isn't it more likely that when I said that I like Harmon because I've watched him (the "my eyes" reply) that I'm looking at more than interceptions. Anyway. Nevermind. I accept your apology
Thing is, outside of the first game against the Jets in week two, the team hasn't really let him use his range. He's mostly been sitting back in a Cover-1 or Cover-2 shell and playing almost exclusively zone from what I've seen. Granted, I don't have the All-22, so I may be mistaken.
He plays the McCourty role basically sitting in centerfield and using his range to help out on the deeper receiver. McCourty is better at it naturally and offers more versatility right now but Harmon is, as I've repeatedly said from the time we drafted him, a McCourty backup for that deep lying role.












