Roger Goodell needs to head to New England and face the music
This thing bothers me to this day. No one ever mentions this open lie.As Goodell wrote in his ruling: “The sharp contrast between the almost complete absence of communications through the AFC championship game and the extraordinary volume of communication during the three days following the AFC championship game undermines any suggestion that the communications addressed only preparation of footballs for the Super Bowl rather than the tampering allegations and their anticipated responses to inquiries about the tampering.”
That sounded reasonable at the time. The idea that Brady and Jastremski would suddenly begin talking after being accused of cheating yet not discuss being accused of cheating is absurd. If true, that would be a damning sign of guilt.
Except, it wasn’t true. Despite vehement legal objections from the NFL, federal judge Richard Berman unsealed Brady’s under-oath testimony. It contained multiple statements from Brady that he and Jastremski did, indeed, repeatedly discuss the allegations as well as preparing for the Super Bowl.
“I was trying to figure out what happened,” Brady testified, according to federal court documents in one example of many. “[It] was certainly my concern [to attempt] to figure out, you know, what could be – possibly could have happened to those balls.”
So Goodell simply invented – or ignored – Brady’s actual testimony in order to find guilt. He claimed Brady said the opposite of what Brady actually said only to get busted when a document he never thought would become public did, indeed, become public.
Because this occurred more than six months after deflate-gate began it received a fraction of the initial attention and is rarely cited to this day. It remains the single most galling NFL action in the case … the champion of many strong contenders.