My basic game theory > homerism.
Game theory is based upon rational thought, there's nothing rational about taking a punter over the greatest player of all time.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.My basic game theory > homerism.
Game theory is based upon rational thought, there's nothing rational about taking a punter over the greatest player of all time.
Game theory is based upon rational thought, there's nothing rational about taking a punter over the greatest player of all time.
No.Clever, but wrong.
A cloak that give +4 protection, but is extremely rare with no comparable items - no cloaks that offer more than +1, will cost more than a sword that gives +8 damage if the game is filled with other swords that give +7 damage.
You're drafting the whole team you will field, so the position is not as important as the difference in quality between choices A, B, C, or D at said position. With only 12 drafting, the drop-off won't be dramatic for most positions.
If Fouts believed that Guy was just that much better than any other punter, I see his reasoning, even if I disagree with his choice.
Clever, but wrong.
A cloak that give +4 protection, but is extremely rare with no comparable items - no cloaks that offer more than +1, will cost more than a sword that gives +8 damage if the game is filled with other swords that give +7 damage.
You're drafting the whole team you will field, so the position is not as important as the difference in quality between choices A, B, C, or D at said position. With only 12 drafting, the drop-off won't be dramatic for most positions.
If Fouts believed that Guy was just that much better than any other punter, I see his reasoning, even if I disagree with his choice.
TB was the second QB taken so not as bad as Dungy's thoughts.
BB being the 9th coach taken is pretty bad imo.
Was AV taken and I missed his name or what ?
Football isn't a fantasy game. Punters are swords or spells. Football is real life.Yes.
Football isn't a fantasy game. Punters are swords or spells. Football is real life.
a QB has 1000 times the impact of a punter.
Proof? Just look at the draft.
Then why are you arguing?I said multiple times I didn't agree with his choice for just that reason. But in a draft like this, it's not just about who's number 1 at any position, but how much better the available choices are in comparison to those next in line.
If you believe there's no one remotely in Lawrence Taylor's league, but that Montana and Peyton and Jonny U are all close to Brady, you take Taylor, expecting to get one of the other quarterbacks later.
But yeah, of course it depends on position. To take a guard, for example, or a punter or kicker, seems extreme to me.
Football isn't a fantasy game. Punters are swords or spells. Football is real life.
a QB has 1000 times the impact of a punter.
Proof? Just look at the draft.
Well we are debating a fantasy draft or real football players.All true, except that we are debating a fantasy draft...this is not real life.
Some of you are taking this much too seriously.
Then why are you arguing?
But it doesn't relate. Football is real life not a computer game.You mean talking about game theory in such a setting and how it might apply to Fouts' reasoning?
I don't know, maybe it's because I've made a great living for the last 30 years writing books and designing games.
And the example I gave...yeah, that's part of designing MMO's.
But it doesn't relate. Football is real life not a computer game.
football is played by humans.You have no idea of how a design team works on a computer game, clearly.
And football, news flash, is a game. And football DRAFTING, especially in a fantasy, concocted scenario like the link, is most certainly a game.