Cunk
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- May 8, 2015
- Messages
- 134
- Reaction score
- 169
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Well then we disagree because I think that offense and that defense is good enough to beat anyone.No, of course not. Even with all the mistakes we made, we were still in it until the last second, and I was sure we would score. Then I was praying we'd win the toss in OT, because if we had to put the D back on the field (obviously BB's thought too at the end of the game) we were going to lose.
The OP's question was can the Patriots win the SB, and my answer remains the same, not with that defense. That doesn't mean the Pats won't get it fixed, but you have to admit, the D did not look good last night, any way you slice it.
You think they are going to lose to the worst team in the NFL?
I was thinking about that too. Before 2001, the Patriots had higher picks in the draft. Players like McGinest, Law, etc came from those drafts. When you're picking late because of excellence year after year, you don't get those higher picks. I know you can build through free agency, but that is more expensive.The thing I don't get is why can't BB put together a defense like 2001-2004 or like the current seahawks D?
NoNo but it could be a close game.
I was thinking about that too. Before 2001, the Patriots had higher picks in the draft. Players like McGinest, Law, etc came from those drafts. When you're picking late because of excellence year after year, you don't get those higher picks. I know you can build through free agency, but that is more expensive.
I'm not overly concerned by the D. People are always concerned by the D, but the reality is big game losses like this (31-24) are abnormal for the Patriots. They usually win shootouts. Where they are screwed is in 21-17 type losses where the offense cannot do enough.
Just look at their season-ending losses since 2007:
14-17 nyg
n/a
33-14 bal (think we all agree this game was aberration beatdown)
28-21 njy (really 28-14, garbage score makes it look nicer)
17-21 nyg
13-28 bal
16-26 den
18-20 den
So the offense couldn't crack 20 points in losses (disregarding garage score vs jets). That's not gonna win many playoff games. All of these losses are due to offensive ineptitude.
The only team IMO that can stop the Pats offense is Denver D. Even Seattle we saw they were on the verge of 31 and rolled up the yards.
Don't fear the D. Fear the OL.
My point is that is when the team loses: when the O can't do anything, usually because the OL lays an egg.I don't think this team will lose this year because of the OL. It will be the defense. Not the same defense as last year.
Of course, but I will say that we no longer have a cakewalk in the AFC. We learned that last night without even playing an AFC team.
KC, Denver, and Baltimore could all get us if the offense doesn't have its best day. All three have very good defenses.
Even Oakland could give us a shootout. Could you imagine what Derek Carr would've done to that defense last night?
Even Oakland could give us a shootout. Could you imagine what Derek Carr would've done to that defense last night?
| 2K | 53K |
| 97 | 3K |
| 5 | 1K |
| 312 | 20K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 4 - April 19 (Through 26yrs)











