ashley
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2014
- Messages
- 19,926
- Reaction score
- 33,922
lol, always good to know.he has a wife
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.lol, always good to know.he has a wife
It's a simple question that can't be answered. The original poster said there was no talent on the team. Does Bill not pick the players?LOL.
A response to the question of "So your problem is Bill the GM and not Bill the coach?" in a thread about the head coaching legacy is answered with "You say there was no talent on the team. Whose fault is that?"
smh
That is how i see it with BB. Injuries of course can derail things, but after 5 years without Brady if we don't see the final 4, it more than fair to question the legacy of Bill as the 'GOAT'. How would you measure it though?
The offensive performance pre covid and post covid outbreak was drastically different especially with Cam. Their coaching couldnt hide the deficiencies of the roster once Cam couldnt pass or passed 8ft higher than the next WR. That week between KC/Denver/SF killed the season.Oh come on...I think Bill is a great coach, but let's be consistent and not continue to move the goalposts. Most pundits and experts, and most fans, thought the Patriots would win 8-9 games or perhaps 10-11 if everything went right. I realize they lost some players due to opt-outs, but it's not like they had some devastating injury to their franchise QB or something to point to that would indicate they were much, much worse in talent than they appeared prior to the season.
Even after the Covid opt-outs, Vegas had them as an 8-9 win team on the over/under.
You'd be shocked if any other coach won 2 games? Ridiculous. Sorry. We can't heap praise that doesn't mesh with objective facts and retroactively change reality to fit a narrative. This was not a 1 win roster carried to 7 wins by mystical coaching and 5d chess strategies.
That's the catch-22 the Belichick krishnas have painted themselves into. In order to defend Belichick the coach, they have to point out how bad Belichick the GM is.It's a simple question that can't be answered. The original poster said there was no talent on the team. Does Bill not pick the players?
I've tried to separate the two in the past but it's getting tough. It is the same guy. If Bill can't pick key players well he needs to find someone who can.That's the catch-22 the Belichick krishnas have painted themselves into. In order to defend Belichick the coach, they have to point out how bad Belichick the GM is.
That poster walked into a check mate on BB the GM, but won't admit Belichick is the reason they have "no talent".That's the catch-22 the Belichick krishnas have painted themselves into. In order to defend Belichick the coach, they have to point out how bad Belichick the GM is.
Belichick is under .500 without Brady and it's not likely that changes next season.Belichick has nothing to prove.
I am with youBill is GOAT coach without a doubt and I’m trying to keep that separate from Bill the GM but it’s getting difficult to do.
That’s the tricky part because as great as Bill’s D were if he didn’t have the QB that made the key plays at the end of each of those SB, you win nothing.People still seem to forget how the Pats won at least their first two Super Bowls. The Patriots were designed to be a team that won on defense and asked the offense to be efficient. I would give Belichick more credit than Brady for the first two or three Super Bowls and Brady more credit than Belichick on the last three.
If he has a no trade clause, he will not come to NE as it becoming a graveyard for QB's.
Bill has nothing to prove.
This ****ing fan base is obsessed with getting an answer to an irrelevant, stupid question.