Seriously, sometimes I think he asks for it--being arrogant to other teams, being a jerk to the media, pushing the limits of the rules--just so that when the inevitable blowback comes, he has the bulletin board material to galvanize and focus a group of guys who might otherwise not have much of an edge.
I think of 2007: To get that team of veterans and 3-Super Bowl-winning players so motivated as to destroy the league the way they did, Belichick basically needed 'spygate' to happen.
Am I saying he's so Machiavellian that he's orchestrated things like 'spygate' and 'deflate-gate'? No.
I'm just saying he's realized what a great benefit it is to be the 'villain' of the league, to where nobody gives you the proper respect and everybody tries their hardest against you, because it forces your guys to have an edge and want success (and of course, it gets all of us fans pretty charged too!) So he actively tries to be 'the villain', is my point, so he can build that bunker mentality within the organization (remember, not just the players) and the fanbase.
Just a thought, I'd love to get some opinions on it. Go Pats!
I think of 2007: To get that team of veterans and 3-Super Bowl-winning players so motivated as to destroy the league the way they did, Belichick basically needed 'spygate' to happen.
Am I saying he's so Machiavellian that he's orchestrated things like 'spygate' and 'deflate-gate'? No.
I'm just saying he's realized what a great benefit it is to be the 'villain' of the league, to where nobody gives you the proper respect and everybody tries their hardest against you, because it forces your guys to have an edge and want success (and of course, it gets all of us fans pretty charged too!) So he actively tries to be 'the villain', is my point, so he can build that bunker mentality within the organization (remember, not just the players) and the fanbase.
Just a thought, I'd love to get some opinions on it. Go Pats!
Last edited by a moderator:











