Listen. If you are going to post, I suggest you know what you are talking about. Clearly you don't. If you had, you'd know I was responding to EIFMP.
The fact that the Pats are 9-2 WHILE rebuilding and while having "the worst passing defense" is proof that the Pats shouldn't be taken as lightly as you or EIFMP are taking them. In fact, it should be proof to you two that the Pats are significantly different than the team you faced in week 2 and are significantly better. Instead, you two and the other bumbling Jets fans who are clueless, think your just going to walk all over the Pats.
Actually, it was used to point out that the Pats running game and passing game are a bit more prolific than he was letting on. But you clearly missed that. Which comes from being dumb and jumping into a conversation where you don't understand all that is going on.
Despite what ******ed radio talk show hosts say, the Lions kicker RETURNED TO THE GAME. They actually got a 3 point advantage by getting a TD instead of a FG, and then he returned. The missed PAT made people think that the TD would have been scored if not for the penalty. Missing your kicker for an extra point that wouldn't have even been available if not for the penalty does not compare at all to missing a starting QB and RB for the entire game.
Also, Shaun Hill is still a backup, he is not the #1 Overall pick Matt Stafford. Don't try and compare them to each other.
Jahvid Best was also missing from that game.
2/3 of the Lions most important offensive pieces were missing, including the starting QB.
