Reiss sparks the discussion on inactives today. His projection:
Gillislee, Harris, Waddle, Branch, Reedy, Britt, Dorsett
____
Lets review: From last week's list Burkhead is likely returning and so is Bademosi in place of JJ. Gillislee and Harris have been left out the last 3 games and with team getting healthier its harder to climb to the active list.
The first question is if Waddle is healthy enough to provide some vet backup at tackle? If not, Croston will take his place on the active roster which seems likely but with Waddle returning to practice on Friday in limited capacity it could go either way.
The second question (for some) is the status of Alan Branch. He was available for media again like last week which usually means he could play but I see RJF as a better option at the moment esp. vs Fournette who is faster, more agile and explosive than Henry. Branch still might have some lingering health issue (although he is repeatedly saying he is good to go); he was the only one not running around in warmups we could see but that could also just be his usual thing.
I agree that Reedy is most likely to be inactive bc active spots are too valuable now for players that actually will contribute to carry a pure injury backup. The same could be said for Dorsett in current situation: he didn't have a single snap on Saturday, not even in “garbage“ time (which was strange IMO) and now another receiver in Burkhead is likely returning and with Grissom and Grigsby playing core ST - plus both actually played on D in 4th Q (not to mention GG's 2 sacks - carrying Dorsett this time might not be as useful as some other guys esp. since 11 formations might be rarer in this game.
Then again, like predicted last week, there could be again one surprise inactive like Bademosi vs TEN..