- Joined
- Nov 14, 2006
- Messages
- 52,905
- Reaction score
- 33,916
According to PFF he allowed 1 completion in 2 games. Feel free to cite any actual examples of him not playing well to back up you just saying it because you wanted to.
Moves are good or bad, they make your team stronger or weaker.
By definition if you subtract the guy you chose only when a safety was injured you are weaker if you have another injury.
They didn’t gain any “overpriced” advantage because they are still paying him and the guy who replaces him in the roster.
If Duggar want Duggar we wouldn’t be taking about Duggar? Genius.
I don't take PFF seriously. Never did. You can check my history on it. They are horrible especially when they assign blame on things like giving up completions. Many times they just assign it to the guy closest to the receiver even if they weren't at fault.
Again, this trade showed what the coaching staff felt about how well Dugger played. They thought he was a liability. Otherwise they wouldn't have traded them. I will take their judgement over PFF.
And again, who says this makes the team weaker? And even if it is, we are talking about a back up safety who barely plays. You are acting like they traded the Dugger from 2023. He is no longer that guy. This was a nothing move that you are acting like will sink this team. Fact is whether this trade is good or bad, the team is basically the same team it was before the Dugger trade.












