bakes781
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2006
- Messages
- 6,005
- Reaction score
- 4,898
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Reportedly Da Bears are interested in trading up for him. They've got two 2nd round picks.The open question is how much folks will pay to move up for Jeanty. JAX is likely to pick him at 5 if no trades up to get him.
Why is Pick #10 higher in point value than Pick #4. You got taken.Here's a scenario by trading with Chicago
I ran one as well, it's in the LT thread.Here's a scenario by trading with Chicago
I just did a mock where I got #10 and #41 from Chicago, took Banks at #10, Noel at #38. Dropped from #41 to #48 with Miami, picked up Ozzy and then Sanker at #98. Missed all the front line RBs that I would have liked, but added Miles Frazier and Alfred Collins with #69 and #77, which feels like something they might do: focus on LoS. The rest kinda played out like the other mocks we've all done.
I wouldn't give up #106.Why is Pick #10 higher in point value than Pick #4. You got taken.
I'm on the other side of you guys. I'd take the trade down to 10 for 1 of their 2's, and next years 2(more realistic than both 2's this year and gives more ammo next year to address needs). But I'm taking McMillan at 10. Simmons is just way too big of a gamble to take at 10. Just about everyone has him 24 or later. Field Yates the only one I've seen with him in the top 20.I wouldn't give up #106.
Be cool to get #39 AND #41. Then you'd have the juice to get back in to R1 for a guy like Egbuka. Or maybe one of the top safeties. Or you could stand pat, and then load up in 2 and 3.
I was going Banks at #10 and then back up for Egbuka, who feels more like a technician for JMcD to play mad scientist with.I'm on the other side of you guys. I'd take the trade down to 10 for 1 of their 2's, and next years 2(more realistic than both 2's this year and gives more ammo next year to address needs). But I'm taking McMillan at 10. Simmons is just way too big of a gamble to take at 10. Just about everyone has him 24 or later. Field Yates the only one I've seen with him in the top 20.
With 38, 41, 69, and 77 you easily have ammo to get up to Minnesota's pick. One of Conerly or Simmons will be there. Possibly both. Trade 38 and 69 for 24 and a 4 next year. Take your LT.
You've got your WR1, LT, and still have 2 more picks on day 2 to address the defense.
For sure. And thats what moving down gices you. Options to truly maximize picks.I was going Banks at #10 and then back up for Egbuka, who feels more like a technician for JMcD to play mad scientist with.
More than one way to skin a cat, eh?
It was a combo of picks.Why is Pick #10 higher in point value than Pick #4. You got taken.
I know. Didn't show so just messing with him.It was a combo of picks.
I'm not advocating for him but if Greg likes him than I'd be OK with it lok
I'm not advocating for him but if Greg likes him than I'd be OK with it lok
| 7 | 974 |
| 114 | 5K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 5 - April 20 (Through 26yrs)











