What positions would you like to see drafted

[Patsfan1645]

What positions would you like to see drafted. I'm not concerned with the who or in what round (unless you feel like going that far) but more like in an ideal world what positions you feel should be addressed in the draft. We have 9 picks and lets assume they are all equally valuable. Here is the positional needs I would like to see and in no particular order.

WR x2
OL x3
S
RB or TE
K
Edge

 

[hornetfb85]

OT
WR
DL
RB
Edge

 

[PatsFan2]

OT x 2
WR
Edge
TE
RB
DL
DB

 

[Patsfan1645]

I suspect most of us will all choose OT/OL and WR. Its interesting to see the other positions fans think are a current draft need.

 

[chief1]

OT (2)
C
WR (X)
RB
TE
DT
Edge
But do not panic and reach!
Stay true to the best player available as much as possible.

 

[Toofy]

i am going against grain and saying do not expend resources on WR unless we get hunter. we have 2 promising rookies ( douglas + bouute) and 2 unknowns( baker + polk). with Diggs signing and hollins we have a markedly different WR room.

OL x2 ( 2 of 3 - LT, C, LG)
RB
DT
TE
DE
K


if hunter or carter are available thats a bonus and outside of above categories

need to take a running back within top 3 rounds. its such a deep class at RB and DT.

 

[PWRxWLF]

OTx2
OC
LG
WR
TE
RB
Edge
FS
In no particular order.

 

[imahobgoblin]

After signing Diggs and Hollins, I seriously doubt they will double dip at WR. They can only carry 6 WR out of Diggs, Hollins, Bourne, Boutte, Pop, Polk, Baker, JaQuae Jackson, and John Jiles.

 

[Steve102]

Good players. That is all.

 

[Patsfan1645]

After signing Diggs and Hollins, I seriously doubt they will double dip at WR. They can only carry 6 WR out of Diggs, Hollins, Bourne, Boutte, Pop, Polk, Baker, JaQuae Jackson, and John Jiles.

I get that but I also suspect two or three of these guys will be gone, possibly sooner rather than later. If not and this is our WR group the addition of Diggs and Hollins makes it not great but decent. Could look to replenish an aging TE and RB group perhaps.

 

[Patsfan1645]

Good players. That is all.

 

[imahobgoblin]

I get that but I also suspect two or three of these guys will be gone, possibly sooner rather than later. If not and this is our WR group the addition of Diggs and Hollins makes it not great but decent. Could look to replenish an aging TE and RB group perhaps.

Yes 2 or 3 but we still have only room for 1 more. I can't see Boutte or Pop getting cut. I listed 9 and then add draft picks?

 

[Patsfan1645]

Yes 2 or 3 but we still have only room for 1 more. I can't see Boutte or Pop getting cut. I listed 9 and then add draft picks?

Your right...maybe more will be let go. I think Diggs, Hollins, Pop and Boutte are the only "probable locks". Lots of people on the forum dont think Bourne is any good, I think he is a decent 2/3 and would like see how he does with Josh back. He could clearly be a part of a trade deal so who knows.

 

[Ring 6]

OT
WR
EDGE
CB
RB
G/C
K
DT
LB
TE

 

[Username]

Good players. That is all.

This.

We need difference makers.

If Hunter and Carter are gone by 4, I'm taking Mason Graham. They are the only three elite, blue chip, game wrecking players in this class.

 

[p8ryts]

A certified starter day one.

 

[yukon cornelius]

OT in the top 15 or so......i am AOK, in fact prefer, a trade down to 11-15 or so, if possible

WR, but I'm also ok with a TE in the first two days.......there's actually a few intriguing options here, as well as into the later draft.....a few traditional TE's, a few non-traditional types, that I wouldn't mind seeing.......we know Josh loves his TEs......

WR, likely 2nd or 3rd RD is my guess

OG and OC later in the draft.....

CB/S mid draft

Edge would be nice, DL is probably not a bad idea just because it is a deep draft here

 

[varjao]

OL (2)
WR
RB
Edge

 

[Love The Drake]

2 OL
2 WR
2 DL
1K
1RB
1S

 

[jmt57]

BPA, but for the sake of this conversation

OT x2
C/G
Edge
DL (insurance for Barmore's health)
TE (Hunter Henry will be 31 this year)
RB
WR
FS

I wouldn't mind there being fewer than nine picks thanks to trade-ups.
Quality vs Quantity