I thought you were done posting about this. Somewhere previously in this conversation you used the words that I was making excuses for Daboll, and now after bowing out, excuses are all you are left with.
Two years ago McDermott couldn't capitalize on the "Hamlin event." History has shown over and over that when teams have a major event to play for, it provides incentive to carry them over the top. McDermott still led the Bills to loss when he had Josh Allen and the intangibles overwhelmingly in his favor. And we all know how McDermott handed the Chiefs a championship gift from probably the worst coaching decision in playoff history.
On the subject of winning after a major event, the Red Sox are a team that broke their losing tradition with a championship. What about Buffalo's losing tradition of losing championships before McDermott? Other than not being able to even make the Super Bowl has McDermott broken that losing culture or added to it? I guarantee you were saying the Red Sox had a losing tradition even with their success of making playoffs during those decades.
You were right. I am done posting about this because it's hard to discuss anything with someone who only uses binary thinking.
I am using your scale. You said he should have won solely because of who his qb is. I said on your scale he shouldn’t have because he lost to better QBs. There are zero excuses on what I said.
McDermott track record speaks for itself (as does Dabolls). He has done a good job.
You introduced a reason he didn’t and I am pointing out that according to your own criteria he can’t be criticized.
You think losing a player should guarantee he wins a SB? Where has history shown over and over again that something like that guarantees a championship? Do you have examples? All the I ex I can think of shazier, stingley, the Detroit guy that almost died, Dennis Byrd didn’t lead to championships. I think you are grasping at straws.
I gave no clue what the Red Sox have to do with this.
McDermott took over a team that had made the playoffs ZERO TIMES IN SEVENTEEN YEARS and hadn’t won their division in 21.
He took them to the playoffs his first season, and 7 of the 8 he has been there. He has won the division 5 years running.
Looks like an incredible turnaround to me.
Your argument is that he stinks because in 7 years he hasn’t yet been the best of all 32 teams. You do realize that by saying this you are essentially saying almost every current HC sucks because there are less than I can count on one hand who won a sb in their first 7 years.
But Brian Daboll is a stud