PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

PATRIOTS NEWS Patriots request to interview Ben Johnson

Breaking New England Patriots Team News
Status
Not open for further replies.
People are aware of this information without your help.

What we don't know is how Daboll would do with a matured QB like Josh Allen. Oh wait!

Once again there is no thinking out of the box.

Kraft is cheap.
You seem to need my help.
So your argument is a guy who stinks 9 out of 11 years is great and it’s everyone else’s fault and the guy who built a wining program is nobody.

So if I say Ryan leaf is better than Tom Brady but he never had the chance of good players and coaching, that is thinking outside the box?

Yes Kraft is cheap, what’s your point?
 
Unfortunately After the fallout of Mayo
Robert will go with what HC that will stabilize the fanbase
After seeing a half filled stadium with half of them fans from other teams
Fans wearing bags on their head, booing the team and their HC
Kraft will make a choice to protect his investment over hitting a home run
As I have stated
I like Vrabel and BJ
I hope they give BJ a fair chance
If he blows FP them away I’m fine with that
But in the end I think it will be Vrabel and I’m fine with that choice also
A mountain more happy than when they hired Mayo
This is how I see it working out as well. Unless Johnson totally blows everyone away, Vrabel is the safer choice. I am good with Vrabel, the team needs his sense of determination right now. Somehow it feels like Mayo defending why he went for the safety instead of kicking the extra point by saying that everyone was mad when he did it the other way a few games before that. How is this brain trust going to make the decision? My fear is that they are still going with their gut and no well thought out reasoning.
 
That’s a bad reason not to hire one lol
Our odds of making the playoffs with a rookie head coach are non-zero. In fact it's about 24/84 but obviously the quality of the coach, the situation he comes into, and talent Acquistion play a big role as well. I'm also interested to see if Patriots finally interview and hire a GM.

 
Our odds of making the playoffs with a rookie head coach are non-zero. In fact it's about 24/84 but obviously the quality of the coach, the situation he comes into, and talent Acquistion play a big role as well. I'm also interested to see if Patriots finally interview and hire a GM.

It’d be great to turn it around and make the playoffs next year, but not sure that’s what the priority should be. They’re 4-13 in back to back years with probably the least talented roster in the league and 3 straight years bouncing around coordinators/systems on offense and even on defense to some degree last year. First and foremost, they need to be worried about just locking in a culture, idea of how they want to play, system of player development, etc.

Hopefully that leads to a big jump in wins right away, but I care more about seeing the team actually progress. In 2022 (the Patricia OC year) they were “win and you’re in” for the playoffs the last week of the year. I still look at that season as a total **** show because of how obvious it was that the culture was eroding and player development was failing. More wins next year won’t make me happy if it still looks like their floundering and struggling to find an identity and to develop players and just getting some lucky bounces and/or good scheduling fortune.
 
That’s all petty, Vrabel was traded after calling Kraft cheap before.
He was a player in a contract dispute, not the same at all lol

I’m half joking but it would be weird as hell having Brunell on the staff. I would just be thinking about him crying over literally nothing all the time
 
It’d be great to turn it around and make the playoffs next year, but not sure that’s what the priority should be. They’re 4-13 in back to back years with probably the least talented roster in the league and 3 straight years bouncing around coordinators/systems on offense and even on defense to some degree last year. First and foremost, they need to be worried about just locking in a culture, idea of how they want to play, system of player development, etc.

Hopefully that leads to a big jump in wins right away, but I care more about seeing the team actually progress. In 2022 (the Patricia OC year) they were “win and you’re in” for the playoffs the last week of the year. I still look at that season as a total **** show because of how obvious it was that the culture was eroding and player development was failing. More wins next year won’t make me happy if it still looks like their floundering and struggling to find an identity and to develop players and just getting some lucky bounces and/or good scheduling fortune.
My eyes hurt.
 
Our odds of making the playoffs with a rookie head coach are non-zero. In fact it's about 24/84 but obviously the quality of the coach, the situation he comes into, and talent Acquistion play a big role as well. I'm also interested to see if Patriots finally interview and hire a GM.

are we trying to make the playoffs next year or trying to win a SB at some point in the near future?
 
You seem to need my help.
So your argument is a guy who stinks 9 out of 11 years is great and it’s everyone else’s fault and the guy who built a wining program is nobody.

So if I say Ryan leaf is better than Tom Brady but he never had the chance of good players and coaching, that is thinking outside the box?

Yes Kraft is cheap, what’s your point?

Excellent thought process comparing a QB's results to a coach. Shows deep football understanding.

Go down the list of where teams finish and who is their QB.

Example: NFL East
1) Philly - Hurts
2) Washington - Daniels
3) Dallas - mostly Zack
4) NY - mostly no one

This may come as a surprise to you, but consistently the order of finish throughout the NFL directly correlates to who has the best QB play. Every year. Yes there are minor exceptions like Cinci with a meh coach finishing below Pittsburgh or Minnesota running with Darnold, but every single year with few exceptions (one of which Daboll was his first year) the finish represents QB play. And the teams with the best QB's generally go furthest in the playoffs. Recent Super Bowls have been all Brady and Mahomes. Do other coaches suck because they can't break through that? (HINT: McDermott kinda of does.)

I hate to use the cliche that stats are for losers, but you don't win with that Giant's QB mess, even if you are GOAT. No one would.

Somehow Daboll squeezed one year out of Daniel Jones, who isn't even a top backup, and it has been his downfall.

Go back to your Strat-o-matic analysis.
 
Last edited:
Our odds of making the playoffs with a rookie head coach are non-zero. In fact it's about 24/84 but obviously the quality of the coach, the situation he comes into, and talent Acquistion play a big role as well. I'm also interested to see if Patriots finally interview and hire a GM.


Wouldn't the odds be 28% and not non-zero? Of course non-zero technically means anything other than zero, and that is correct if the math says 28%, but I don't think its your point.
 
Excellent thought process comparing a QB's results to a coach. Shows deep football understanding.

Go down the list of where teams finish and who is their QB.

Example: NFL East
1) Philly - Hurts
2) Washington - Daniels
3) Dallas - mostly Zack
4) NY - mostly no one

This may come as a surprise to you, but consistently the order of finish throughout the NFL directly correlates to who has the best QB play. Every year. Yes there are minor exceptions like Cinci with a meh coach finishing below Pittsburgh or Minnesota running with Darnold, but every single year with few exceptions (one of which Daboll was his first year) the finish represents QB play. And the teams with the best QB's generally go furthest in the playoffs. Recent Super Bowls have been all Brady and Mahomes. Do other coaches suck because they can't break through that? (HINT: McDermott kinda of does.)

I hate to use the cliche that stats are for losers, but you don't win with that Giant's QB mess, even if you are GOAT. No one would.

Somehow Daboll squeezed one year out of Daniel Jones, who isn't even a top backup, and it has been his downfall.

Go back to your Strat-o-matic analysis.
People deserve credit or blame for what they do. By your analysis everyone is a great coach because QB stats happen in a vacuum and good qb stats mean good coach and bad qb stats mean the coaches job is irrelevant and he’s great because losing and failing is find if you have an excuse.
 
Our odds of making the playoffs with a rookie head coach are non-zero. In fact it's about 24/84 but obviously the quality of the coach, the situation he comes into, and talent Acquistion play a big role as well. I'm also interested to see if Patriots finally interview and hire a GM.

I don’t see surprise in the fact that for most of that period 12/32 teams (37.5%) of teams made the playoffs and 28% of teams that changed coaches did.
Teams that change coaches are almost always bad teams. So this stat actually probably favors first time HCs given the circumstances.
 
People deserve credit or blame for what they do. By your analysis everyone is a great coach because QB stats happen in a vacuum and good qb stats mean good coach and bad qb stats mean the coaches job is irrelevant and he’s great because losing and failing is find if you have an excuse.

Trying to decipher your post, but it seems that is entirely NOT what I am saying.

Judging a coach entails evaluating how the coach has performed relative to the team's talent. And with today's rules, this almost completely revolves around the QB. I know. I know. It takes a little thinking.

As an example, McDermott has under performed. The Bills should have at least made a Super Bowl, and would have done so at least once, if he wasn't a meh coach. That's the credit or blame that falls on a coach for what they do. Daboll has no chance making chicken out of chicken salad in that mess, but has done so 33% of the time. If you don't see that, that's fine. It doesn't appear from your posts that you are able.
 
Why? He is awful.
Once again I was poor at sarcasm. I thought the smile would help.

I had just heard that the Giants were bringing him back so I threw it out there.

There does seem to be posters who might want him back here.

My response to those would be the same as yours to me.
 
Listening to Boomer Esiason discuss Milton and compare him to Shadeur Sanders made it sound like Sanders was not a particularly superior prospect.
I watch very little college ball but I did catch CO for a few minutes this year. In that short time I wasn't impressed by Sanders at all.
 
Did Ben Jonson push his interviews back I saw?
 
If pats whiff on vrabel and johnson, i would be fine with Flores as backup plan
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 6 – A Week Before the Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
1 week ago
Patriots Part Ways with Another Linebacker as Offseason Roster Shake-Up Continues
Patriots News 04-05, Mock Draft 2.0, Patriots Look For OL Depth
MORSE: 18 Game Schedule and Other Patriots Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference at the League Meetings 3/31
MORSE: Smokescreens and Misinformation Leading Up to Patriots Draft
Back
Top