- Joined
- Jul 3, 2013
- Messages
- 43,630
- Reaction score
- 50,313
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.So they released the guy who played over 87% of the snaps, and is 26 years old?
Makes sense.
So they released the guy who played over 87% of the snaps, and is 26 years old?
Makes sense.
If you've watched his 'play' it kinda does
I (sadly) tend to agree. While there wasn’t a golden jacket in his future, it’s hard to understand going from almost 9/10 of the time to the street…He was still our 2ND-BEST offensive Lineman. Fact.
Ok then why did they play him 96% of the snaps?Oh no. They cut an underperforming player. Just like every other team does.
It’s not that they cut him, it’s that they felt so highly of him all year long that he played 96% of the snaps then one day, he isn’t even good enough to be a backup. Why can’t they evaluate players?Oh no. They cut an underperforming player. Just like every other team does.
Why is Vederian Lowe playing a similar amount of snaps?Ok then why did they play him 96% of the snaps?
Then why cut Jordan? If he is “who they have” and he is good enough theoretically to play 96% of the snaps why cut him and not a guy who wasn’t good enough to play ahead of him?Why is Vederian Lowe playing a similar amount of snaps?
Because that's who they have. Unfortunately.
Because that's who they have. Or had, rather.Ok then why did they play him 96% of the snaps?
| 36 | 2K |
| 131 | 7K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 20 - May 5 (Through 26yrs)











