- Joined
- Jun 6, 2012
- Messages
- 21,763
- Reaction score
- 24,230
I've always agreed with it being about the team but our difference comes with placing a value on the coaching. I think the importance of coaching is way overstated. They've been teaching mostly the same things for a century+ and even when something new comes up it gets figured out relatively soon.Tom was 3-2 after a little over one month of playing, he had 7 TD's, 4 interceptions and five fumbles at 6 yards per pass attempt.
What happened in 2001 is Tom got better, the team got better, HOF'er Richard Seymour went from a rookie on the bench to a starter.
Tom threw one TD in the entire postseason... we don't have to rewrite history, it's impressive enough without embellishment.
They came out of the tunnel as a team and it took a team effort,
Now, if Bill took Brady out in 2001 and put Drew back in then I don't believe they would have won the SB. But if you left Brady in and switched to the OC I feel they could have.
I'm a firm believer in the old adage that coaches don't win games, players do. When the Pats get more talent is when they'll win.












