- Joined
- Sep 2, 2006
- Messages
- 8,748
- Reaction score
- 8,095
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Lamar is a good (B+) passer, with upside given some WR talent (which has been lacking in Baltimore), and he's an elite football player.I agree LM is an upgrade over Mac. You think hes a top 5 QB and an elite passer which I don't.
I think if you're going to say you truly want the Patriots to pursue Lamar then you're necessarily agreeing with "paying him." If you're cautious about paying him then you don't truly want him as your QB. I'll take Rodgers over Mac for the next 2-3 seasons but I'm not paying Rodgers $50 mil per so in reality I really don't want Rodgers here.You think hes more of a difference-maker than I do thus why i'm not paying him what he wants.
If he's who we hope he'd be, he will get through this and prove to everyone he's the franchise. A little mental toughness neededThis is creating a mess, ex and current Patriots players tweeting about Lamar now. Kraft should have never mentioned anything, either make it happen or squash the rumors asap.
I feel bad for Mac, dude is in a no win situation.
The momentum is building!This is creating a mess, ex and current Patriots players tweeting about Lamar now. Kraft should have never mentioned anything, either make it happen or squash the rumors asap.
Mental toughness is something he hasn’t shown as of yet. His pouting and cheap shots show me he’s weak minded, I’ll add maturity issues to that as well.If he's who we hope he'd be, he will get through this and prove to everyone he's the franchise. A little mental toughness needed
Mac falls short in the mental (and physical) toughness scale as far as I'm concerned. That display at the end of the Baltimore game is hard to ignore. His biggest weakness however is in the talent category.If he's who we hope he'd be, he will get through this and prove to everyone he's the franchise. A little mental toughness needed
Cam Newton could be an example, no?I have seen no such studies one way or the other, but the burden is on you to support that claim. Conventional wisdom is that running is more dangerous than passing, not because of injury frequency but because of the greater impact of any injuries on the ability to run at an elite level. You aren't seriously disputing that RB's have short careers vs QB's? Why do you think that is? So what makes you think running QB's can have longevity running significantly better than RB's? And what's an example of a running QB excelling for the long term in the NFL?
Here's a link to NFL longevity by position.
Seems highly unlikely.Lamar possibly gives them a decade of excellence.
I think he was trying to type a century of greatness. I mean he has already deliverd 4 years of greatness to Baltimore.Seems highly unlikely.
He can't play until he's 35? Randall Cunningham played to 38 and ran effectively to age 31. Similar build, Lamar is a little more compact. Lamar is also a better passer and runner than Cunningham.Seems highly unlikely.
I don't think he's elite but whatever.Lamar is a good (B+) passer, with upside given some WR talent (which has been lacking in Baltimore), and he's an elite football player.
1. Mahomes
2. Allen
3. Burrow
4. Hurts
5. Herbert
6. Jackson
LJ slipped a little in my rankings given the way 2022 ended (with him on the sideline) but he's only a whisker behind Herbert and with a full season at his ceiling he could reach #2. I think Hurts is great, and I loved his SB performance, but I want to see another season like this last one. Burrow's elite especially with those exceptional WRs. Allen has the highest ceiling of any QB in the NFL (but red zone turnovers killed him this season). Mahomes will probably remain #1 for as long as he's paired with Reid.
He may not have a choice what to accept if he wants to play somewhere other than BALI think if you're going to say you truly want the Patriots to pursue Lamar then you're necessarily agreeing with "paying him." If you're cautious about paying him then you don't truly want him as your QB. I'll take Rodgers over Mac for the next 2-3 seasons but I'm not paying Rodgers $50 mil per so in reality I really don't want Rodgers here.
I didn't say he can't, I said it's highly unlikely. Which is why your point of comparison retired in...2001.He can't play until he's 35? Randall Cunningham played to 38 and ran effectively to age 31. Similar build, Lamar is a little more compact. Lamar is also a better passer and runner than Cunningham.
I imagine they are on the same page re: Jackson and pay. I don't know what the % is, but I am sure they have a % of cap they will pay for each position. They didn't exceed that # for Tom Brady, why TF would they for Lamar Jackson.Does anyone think Kraft is going to allow BB to sign a contract for $250M guaranteed? Kraft says it is BB decision. Wink wink.
Kraft is not a cheap owner, but clearly not a big spender either. There is no way the Pats risk the whole franchise and Kraft's business model on a running QB who has been injured the last two years.
Cunningham played only 3 full seasons after the age of 27.He can't play until he's 35? Randall Cunningham played to 38 and ran effectively to age 31.
Cunningham was a bigger player but still injury prone.Similar build, Lamar is a little more compact. Lamar is also a better passer and runner than Cunningham.
The Pats want an elite passer, they don't need an elite runner. They have RB's for that, they have one of the most talented RB's in the league in Rhamondre. I don't care if elite passing comes from Mac, Zappe or the kid they pick in the upcoming draft. What we know for sure, is it won't come from Lamar Jackson.Certainly have mixed feelings on this. Its a major risk but if you combine 2 elite level talents the results are exponential. And yes i do still believe bb is a elite hc and when lamar is healthy he’s borderline elite. I don’t think Lamar has more than 4-5 years left at this level, but at the same time we can go all in for this window and if it works out as planned we will have a chance at a couple more rings before having to reset again.
While i do sympathize with mac here im not concerned if it doesn’t work out with lamar. And if it is an issue he wasnt cut out for this career. Look at jimmy g , the 49ers weren’t just rumored to be tied to other qbs, they literally spent 3 first rounders on his replacement. After that jimmy started for them 2 more years without a complaint as long as he was healthy. Mac will also need to suck it up.
If you tell Crawdaddy that Mahomes, Burrows and Herbert were better passers than Tom Brady at the same age, he would tell you it was a different game back then so stats are inflated now.Cunningham played only 3 full seasons after the age of 27.
Cunningham was a bigger player but still injury prone.
Better passer? Doubtful.
And I think he will. He's clearly trying to back Baltimore into a corner of having to make a trade and with that Lamar must realize he'll likely get less than the fully guaranteed contract that he's hanging (exclusively) over Baltimore's head.He may not have a choice what to accept if he wants to play somewhere other than BAL
Fair point but he also had his best season at age 35.Cunningham played only 3 full seasons after the age of 27.
Cunningham is taller by 2 inches and they weigh the same. Lamar looks like he has the thinker frame.Cunningham was a bigger player but still injury prone.
We're talking different eras, so there are those various factors, but Lamar blows Randall away in career passing stats (cmp%, TD%, INT%, passer rating).Better passer? Doubtful.
Better passer and runner than Cunningham? You obviously didn’t play Tecmo Bowl.He can't play until he's 35? Randall Cunningham played to 38 and ran effectively to age 31. Similar build, Lamar is a little more compact. Lamar is also a better passer and runner than Cunningham.