- Joined
- Oct 10, 2004
- Messages
- 33,220
- Reaction score
- 44,417
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.A little more confusing since he is a proclaimed "Pats fan"Remember when RayRay19 used to post the same wacky takes about Pennington...and then Sanchez?"he'll win FIVE bowls!!! Way better than Brady!!!"...this clown Mac10 must be Ray Ray's kid or something
Clean?Very likely Brady and the ballboys were deflating footballs in other games, if not the 2014 AFCCG. No one calls himself The Deflator for no reason.
I noticed you are avoiding the topic of spygate, which was far worse than deflategate (as I've stated before). Bill's spying operation from 2000-2006 helped every player on the team, including Captain Checkdown.
And as I've repeated, Mahomes success has been completely clean, just like fresh snow.
Clean?
Mahomes sucked in his first Super Bowl and was let off the hook by a choking Jimmy G.
Mahomes sucked in his second Super Bowl and got buried by the GOAT.
Then in the Super Bowl Mahomes got outplayed by the opposing quarterback so the refs had to step in again and put the game away for him.
Meanwhile you're still rambling on about spygate, which had nothing to do with Brady, and produced not a shred of evidence that the team benefitted from at all. And deflategate which is a gigantic nothing burger. No one cares about deflategate anymore, it's seen as a complete joke at this point.
Brady won 4 Super Bowls and 3 Super Bowl MVPs after spygate and deflategate. So you should just STFU.
Imagine thinking that winning 6 more AFCCG's is a negative. Sick burn, dude.Yes, as in free of controversy.
So he's tied with Brady for number of super bowls where he sucked. Except Mahomes won two SB MVPs despite "sucking." Brady OTOH lost to Eli...twice.
Did Mahomes fumble the game away like Hurts did? Also, the refs never bail out Brady...
So Bill spying on his opponents for 7 years straight didn't benefit Brady at all? Got it. Only an idiot would think so. Even Jimmy Johnson tried taping signals and gave up after he felt it didn't work. Obviously it was working for Bill.
So he's 3-3 in super bowls outside of the scandals. Good for him.
Timmy doesn’t believe a word he’s saying. He’s just mad that Tom Brady, the undisputed greatest QB of all time, has a ring without Bill. And he completely owns Mahomes. 2-0 in games that matter.Imagine thinking that winning 6 more AFCCG's is a negative. Sick burn, dude.
Same logic as Montana making 4 Super Bowls > Brady making 10Imagine thinking that winning 6 more AFCCG's is a negative. Sick burn, dude.
The 2001-2004 Pats won largely due to defense. Please explain how taping the opponents defensive signals enabled that. Can't wait.Yes, as in free of controversy.
So he's tied with Brady for number of super bowls where he sucked. Except Mahomes won two SB MVPs despite "sucking." Brady OTOH lost to Eli...twice.
Did Mahomes fumble the game away like Hurts did? Also, the refs never bail out Brady...
So Bill spying on his opponents for 7 years straight didn't benefit Brady at all? Got it. Only an idiot would think so. Even Jimmy Johnson tried taping signals and gave up after he felt it didn't work. Obviously it was working for Bill.
So he's 3-3 in super bowls outside of the scandals. Good for him.
Like I said Timmy doesn't believe a word he's saying. He's just triggered that Brady left the Patriots and won a ring without Bill and the Patriots have been way less successful without the GOAT. And even admitted as much.The 2001-2004 Pats won largely due to defense. Please explain how taping the opponents defensive signals enabled that. Can't wait.
Hitting a QB on the head is a penalty. Check your trusty rulebook.Yes, as in free of controversy.
So he's tied with Brady for number of super bowls where he sucked. Except Mahomes won two SB MVPs despite "sucking." Brady OTOH lost to Eli...twice.
Did Mahomes fumble the game away like Hurts did? Also, the refs never bail out Brady...
"Spying" on someone giving signals in front of 10s of thousands of people.So Bill spying on his opponents for 7 years straight didn't benefit Brady at all? Got it. Only an idiot would think so. Even Jimmy Johnson tried taping signals and gave up after he felt it didn't work. Obviously it was working for Bill.
The 2001-2004 Pats won largely due to defense. Please explain how taping the opponents defensive signals enabled that. Can't wait.
"Spying" on someone giving signals in front of 10s of thousands of people.
Bill's mistake is his interpretation of the memo and rule as no filming from that spot only if not using the tapes in game (and the league confirmed they weren't being used in game) should have been checked with the league first. They would have said he couldn't do it and that would have been it.Hitting a QB on the head is a penalty. Check your trusty rulebook.
"Spying" on someone giving signals in front of 10s of thousands of people.
The important thing to remember is Tom Brady, winner of more championships than any other franchise in the NFL and undisputed greatest QB of all time completely owns Kermit Mahomes when it matters most.Spygate was about videotaping opponents and (allegedly) using the taped signals for future games against that same opponent. So let's take a looksy...
2001 - Pats played the Rams in the regular season and again played them in the SB
2003 - Pats played the Titans and Colts in the regular season and again played them in the playoffs
2004 - Pats played the Steelers in the regular season and again played them in the playoffs
You have 6th round pick who won SB MVP twice during the spygate era...your telling me that he didn't benefit from knowing the opponent's defensive signals? LMAO
Were 10s of thousands of people videotaping the Pats opponent's signals? Didn't think so. This is a lame Belichick excuse. Also, this was in an era before modern smart phones.
Poor Kermit. Couldn't beat Brady when it mattered and he'll never get a chance to do it.LOL at the idea of Bill misinterpreting the rules and "accidentally cheating." Just like Bill taking the tarp off early in the AFC divisional game in 2001 vs the Raiders was a "misinterpretation of the rules." A former patriots assistance coach once said that "You'd want Bill and Ernie doing your taxes. They would find all the loopholes, and then when the IRS would close them, they'd find more." What Bill took advantage of was the league not caring about enforcing it's rules. Regardless, it's still cheating.
Hey dummy, the QB signals were already being sent via headset in 2001. There were no offensive signals to tape.Spygate was about videotaping opponents and (allegedly) using the taped signals for future games against that same opponent. So let's take a looksy...
2001 - Pats played the Rams in the regular season and again played them in the SB
2003 - Pats played the Titans and Colts in the regular season and again played them in the playoffs
2004 - Pats played the Steelers in the regular season and again played them in the playoffs
You have 6th round pick who won SB MVP twice during the spygate era...your telling me that he didn't benefit from knowing the opponent's defensive signals? LMAO
Were 10s of thousands of people videotaping the Pats opponent's signals? Didn't think so. This is a lame Belichick excuse. Also, this was in an era before modern smart phones.
This has already been debunked on this board.LOL at the idea of Bill misinterpreting the rules and "accidentally cheating." Just like Bill taking the tarp off early in the AFC divisional game in 2001 vs the Raiders was a "misinterpretation of the rules."
So any rule violation is cheating, like say, offensive holding? Pass interference?A former patriots assistance coach once said that "You'd want Bill and Ernie doing your taxes. They would find all the loopholes, and then when the IRS would close them, they'd find more." What Bill took advantage of was the league not caring about enforcing it's rules. Regardless, it's still cheating.
| 5 | 766 |
| 63 | 5K |
| 102 | 8K |
| 69 | 8K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











