So what? Curran has way more access to the inner workings of the Pats than anyone on this board. His conjecture is more accurate than anything we can come up with. BTW it's not like any of this is outlandish.
This is what happens when you have an organization that runs press conferences like top secret mtgs in the war room. You get a whole lot of conjecture to fill in the blanks.
You seem to be extremely triggered by this story. Bottom line we'll see on Sunday if Bourne gets more snaps or not and then we'll know.
The team limits access for a good reason. It's the team's job to win football games and keep its employees focused on that, not on serving up tasty tidbits for the media.
Your suggestion that it's now acceptable to tack together a story based on a month's old interview with the owner and a bunch of conjecture, IMO shows how far people's standards have slipped.
We'll know he's out of the doghouse.
We'll know the pressure (prob. internal) on the coaches worked.
We'll know if his perf. warranted the benching.
We'll know if the O is more efficient.
You also seem to be suggesting you want to follow a team that reacts to the owner's pressure ala the Dallas Cowboys.
I thought one of the biggest lessons Kraft took away after telling Parcells who to draft and then putting together the failed Carrol/Zampese/Grier experiment was that he should stay the bleep out of the football side of the operation.
It seems to me he probably still is and Curran is just pulling stuff out his backside to get clicks, but, regardless, the idea that Krafty Bob should be telling the football side what to do is a bad thing, IMO.
Patricia is a fat fool, so insecure that he can't resist making roster decisions about his pathetic insecurity rather than about the team. A head coach who would put such a fool in a position of authority is pretty d------d foolish himself. Fat Matt needs to get a new hobby - toy rockets, maybe - and GTFO.
Nice scree, but, again, we have no idea what Patricia's actual role in any of this is.
We do know that
Curran says he does not know.
And PS, that reminds me... Randy had a time or two when this whole forum would have been happy with benching him b/c he "took a play off" or something. Whatever the sports media said that week....
This fan base also went nuts when Bob Kraft "picked the groceries" in the form of Terry Glenn over Cedric Jones, but now it's ok for Krafty Bob the football mensch to (perhaps be) sticking his nose in because their binkie (perhaps is) being benched by the mean old coaches.
I’m not a fan of Patricia or Judge. Both were competely exposed in their little hiatus.
Guess you also didn't want Josh McD back after he was completely exposed after being HC of DEN and being fired before the end of his second season?
Geez, people, have a tiny bit of faith. It's week one. We're in a rebuild. Put down the pitchforks.
There’s not one other team in the nfl who would hire Patricia after his mega collapse in Detroit
That's what people said about Josh McD after his 11-17 run with the Tebow-era Donkeys AND after signing a deal with IND then leaving them at the altar.
We heard countless times how that was the end of Josh, he was now unhireable, yada yada.
Now he's 1-0 with LV.
Off topic, but I thought it was odd that on Sunday the camera showed Welker a bunch of times and the announcers were never like "Hey! Look! It's Wes Welker!" given that he played for both teams and was a NE icon for half a decade, transformed the position, was like the second or third most important player on the 2007 team, etc.
I missed it, I had the audio off. WW was also ex-MIA so he had connections to both teams.