I was still a kid at the time, were Pats fans so annoyingly defensive over the mediocre to bad Pete Carrol teams as they are for this years squad? Because my impression is that fans were absolutely pissed back then.
No. The normal reaction for a fan base is to second guess and criticize the front office/coach when the team isn't performing well. The Patriots fan base, however, has a large amount of people who believe that for the last 20 years, they're somehow tied personally to Bill Belichick's decisions and success, and therefore they become over-the-top defensive about failures. And then there's a faction of that group, which you see a lot of here, who are really, really crazy about Belichick, almost like a cult talking about 2001 as if it's some weird religious decree that the team will transform to greatness through ceremonial offerings to the football gods.
I have no issue with people who think we should give Bill leeway and shouldn't expect to win every year. That's not really my problem with the team. My problem with the team is I'd rather be losing with younger, developing players who are learning and will improve, players who you can build around long-term. What they have out there ain't that. The quarterback is that, but the rest of the team isn't.
Meanwhile, another report came out yesterday that Belichick once again failed to shop a player for best draft return. While "dumb" fans have been calling on them to trade Gilmore for two years, and the "fake media reports" have suggested teams were interested, they did the same exact thing as with Garoppolo, waiting too long, and then in the end making some ridiculous knee jerk trade which is way less than market because they apparently hadn't done anything for over a year to get the best draft value return. At the last minute, a 6th round pick in 2023 and teams telling reporters they would have paid that and more for Gilmore. Same exact thing as Garoppolo and the Browns.
The front office is truly a clown show now; missed deadlines to players for contract offers (Humphries, Cook), missed deadlines for trades (Michael Bennett a few years ago), laughably botched draft returns (Gilmore, Garoppolo.). They've just given away multiple advantages by outright incompetence/arrogance. Imagine declining mutliple first day picks during this rebuild, as they have almost no young stars as their cornerstone.
If you thought the return for Stephon Gilmore was low, then you're not alone. A number of NFL executives feel the same.
boston.cbslocal.com
I can't even post this on the main forum because the response is so cultishly stupid. They'll literally argue that a pick is a pick (they've argued in the past, for example, that a fifth and sixth round pick is great because it's two picks!!! if that argument somehow makes Bill look better.). They'll use dishonest tactics to whitewash it. I argued about the Jimmy G trade for a year. In the end, they claim multiple Browns beat writers, the Browns GM at the time (Sashi Brown), Adam Schefter, and numerous reports about how the trade went down, are all lies, and that the Patriots couldn't have gotten anything better than a second round pick.