- Joined
- Sep 23, 2015
- Messages
- 5,977
- Reaction score
- 10,458
Ok, so I can't respond to all of this because I'm really not saying that deep talent doesn't matter, or Brady's deep ball wasn't good in 2007. Or that he couldn't get comeback wins. Or that there is something "lesser" about short throws. ect. ect. What I'm saying is that Tampa Bay isn't even close to the 2007 Patriots, and Brady is hitting guys in stride & dropping it in the bucket way, way better than usual. 2007? Yes, Brady was great, but there were more than a few deep pass completions that were noticeably off-target & Moss had to bail out Brady. There were also a few times, on incomplete passes, where Randy Moss had to play defensive-back and swat the ball down to prevent the INT (and even intentionally get the PI) just to prevent Brady's deep pass from getting picked. I'm not seeing any of this in Tampa Bay. Brady's deep ball is way more consistent in accuracy. Mike Evans isn't Randy Moss, he wasn't even 100%. So, it's not just talent. It's coaching, too. That's from Arian's emphasis on the deep ball; the amount of time spent in practice on this, the play-design, etc. Everyone knows that's Arians style; and despite its flaws, it really does work when it comes developing the deep game. Put that same Bucs offense in NE, without Arians, and there's no way Brady throws that deep, that often, that well, with that much touch...
Totally disagree. Brady has led the nfl in deep ball throwing more than once. Not sure which exact years but its easy to look up.
As a Pats fan, you should have known this.
The criteria was the ball traveling 30yds or more in the air b4 being touched. #1 in accuracy on those throws.
Kinda destroys the whole premise of your post. But dont let the facts get in the way of
your (false) narrative.