203Pat
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2014
- Messages
- 10,454
- Reaction score
- 18,093
Lol Thomas.Edelman, Gordon, Thomas.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Lol Thomas.Edelman, Gordon, Thomas.
Still don't care if to this point in Dorsetts career he's been better than Patten was in the same span because my original statement is true he still wishes he can become as good as Patten was.Anyone with a brain.
Dorsett's numbers are better than Patten's to this point in their respective careers, and noting that is not cherry picking, but common sense, so you're talking out of your ass on this. Patten played 12 NFL seasons. During those 12 seasons, he topped 30 receptions only 5 times (38, 51, 61, 44, 54). Dorsett's already done it twice, at age 25.
Edelman, Gordon, Thomas.
If this is about overall career then one would assume Patten wins as he played longer and has more stats.
If this is about who is a better receiver I would say it’s Patten has he performed much better playing with Brady in a much more running game dominated era.
I’m still not really sure how this is even a debate. Dorsett would be lucky to end up like David Patten at this point in Dorsett’s career.
Still don't care if to this point in Dorsetts career he's been better than Patten was in the same span because my original statement is true he still wishes he can become as good as Patten was.
Is he likely to go on the regular season pup?
No gibberish at all I'll repeat Dorsett wishes he can be as good as Patten was.As long as you realize that you're now talking gibberish, and that your original statement was useless, albeit intriguing, because of the lack of context, that's great. Have a nice day.
I think there is a great opportunity to use different packages for different schemes.This is the fun part. Edelman at #1 is presumably inarguable. Gordon at #2 is what already happened last year. But after that we have three guys who have never played a game for the Patriots, so the guesswork is all a matter of what you want to project out from.
Thomas is the projection based on career production and veteran savvy, even though he's coming back from a serious injury and has only just started practicing with the Patriots.
Harry is the projection based on being the highest drafted WR of the Belichick era, with traits that should project well to the NFL and some highlight reel catches in practice and preseason.
Meyers is the projection based on being the most productive and impressive WR in camp, getting 1st team reps ahead of Harry, and being healthy for every practice.
And for completeness:
Dorsett is the projection based on knowing the offense better than any receiver other than Edelman, and offering breakaway speed none of the others can match.
No gibberish at all I'll repeat Dorsett wishes he can be as good as Patten was.
What about that statement would make you think I was only referring to Patten 25 years old and younger is the gibberish.
Activated today.Lol Thomas.
Just need to activate Josh and find a TE.
Oh no please continue to tell me how Dorsett is better than Patten.It's gibberish. let it die, as you should have after the first post. You're now making yourself look like an idiot.
Not sure which guy you're talking about (maybe you're replying to a post by someone on my ignore list and I'm missing context), but neither Edelman nor Thomas (if the reports of him being off PUP are accurate) can go on regular season PUP/NFI anymore. Gordon is still eligible for NFI in the regular season.
I’m skipping into this argument without much context but if we are saying “who is better?”, obviously Patten accomplished much more than Dorsett yet has in his career.Oh no please continue to tell me how Dorsett is better than Patten.
He needed Thomas to come back to figure that out?I guess we know why Inman asked for his release, he must've known DT was coming back this week and figured he was out.
Did he play in a meaningful game and produce today? That 3rd spot is very much up in the air.Activated today.
Technically the dispute was simply, "best wr group in the league."Yes, zero impact. If Gordon is not suspended then he will play; when he plays, he's exceptional.
The topic of discussion isn't "team with the WR group most likely to make it through the entire season". The topic of discussion is, "which is the most talented/skilled WR group in the NFL?".