I apologize for being unclear. FWIW, I was piggybacking off your post, not disagreeing with it.
There is a segment of people who think the NFL should only act if there is a guilty verdict. I disagree with that line of reasoning. Ray Rice is a great reason why. All his charges were dropped so the people who subscribe to that line of reasoning would say you can't do anything to Ray Rice. Now we have another example of a player who wasn't even charged in the first place. Once again, anyone who subscribes to the reasoning that you can't do anything without a guilty verdict would have to say you can't do anything to Hunt.
Those are beliefs I just can't get on board with.