Kontradiction
On my retirement tour.
PatsFans.com Supporter
2020 Weekly Picks Winner
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
2023 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2006
- Messages
- 68,279
- Reaction score
- 76,724
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.You are telling me that you would rather have Flowers over Jones? I mean, WTF is going on here? Is day night? Is up down? What world are we living in?
Jones is a relative bargain these days........last 3 years he's outproduced both Mack and Von Miller and makes a fraction of what they make
I would have gladly given Mason's money to Jones.
Chandler cost 2x in guaranteed $ than Gilmore.I like Mason.......I would have paid Jones before Gilmore.....prob have money left over
What world are we living in?
Chandler cost 2x in guaranteed $ than Gilmore.
Of course it’s relevant because it affects how much you have to spend on the other 52 players.Which is irrelevant if the player is playing at a high level
Individually, yes the player is justfying the deal but it all depends how deep and talented of a 53 you want.Which is irrelevant if the player is playing at a high level
Wow, you would prefer flowers 6.5 sacks over Jones 17?
Enough said.
Of course it’s relevant because it affects how much you have to spend on the utter 52 players.
He meant nutter:
At their respective salaries everyone should.
Flowers is a nice player, Jones is a playmaker. I'd take Jones for his cost because he will change a game. Flowers isn't that guy.
Welcome to Patsfans newbie!Flowers is a nice player, Jones is a playmaker. I'd take Jones for his cost because he will change a game. Flowers isn't that guy.
Flowers is a nice player, Jones is a playmaker. I'd take Jones for his cost because he will change a game. Flowers isn't that guy.
| 60 | 3K |
| 8 | 892 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
May 2 - May 17 (Through 26yrs)











