maineman209
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2017
- Messages
- 9,675
- Reaction score
- 20,258
Rosen’s the guy.
The way I heard it, Rosen is, y'know, THAT guy.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Rosen’s the guy.
Why would you double dip at LB when you have a scheme that only uses 2 lbs and you already have Hightower and van noy?
CellphonishWhat is that...yiddish?
The way I heard it, Rosen is, y'know, THAT guy.
Not a fan of that. Not a fan of this tackle class either.
I wouldn’t have an issue with that as I agree with your assessment. Tackle is a need, but it’s an exceptionally weak class. Expending first round capital (and possibly having to move up to do so) would be a waste of resources IMO.Rankin, Noteboom, Christian later would not be that far off mcglinchey......these >6'8" OTs have their weaknesses, too
Apologies. Rosen’s THEE guy.“The guy”
“That guy”
So not just a guy then?
I wouldn’t have an issue with that as I agree with your assessment. Tackle is a need, but it’s an exceptionally weak class. Expending first round capital (and possibly having to move up to do so) would be a waste of resources IMO.
agreed........bottom half of the first round could set up the defense for the next 4-5 years if they can pull off an evans/van der esch and hubbard/landry/carter
I think hubbard/landry/carter will be available in round 2. I think at 23 we are borderline in position to draft evans or van der esche. I am a little worried about Van Der Esche’s neck though. If had I had to take one, I’d take Evans. Of course, I’d be very happy if BB traded up for Trumaine Edwards or Smith.
I think hubbard/landry/carter will be available in round 2. I think at 23 we are borderline in position to draft evans or van der esche. I am a little worried about Van Der Esche’s neck though. If had I had to take one, I’d take Evans. Of course, I’d be very happy if BB traded up for Trumaine Edwards or Smith.
Totally agree. I want Evans and a TE. Eventual Gronk replacement. And, would save us 5m by cutting Allen.I wouldn’t have an issue with that as I agree with your assessment. Tackle is a need, but it’s an exceptionally weak class. Expending first round capital (and possibly having to move up to do so) would be a waste of resources IMO.
When you have the Patriots drafting 20+ players, you'd better hit on at least one of them.
Totally agree. I want Evans and a TE. Eventual Gronk replacement. And, would save us 5m by cutting Allen.
Maybe trade for a vet T?
Lol, no such thing.Eventual Gronk replacement.
What is that...yiddish?
Lol, no such thing.
I imagine Andy's keyboard looks like this:
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 6 - April 21 (Through 26yrs)










