In order:
1. The Pats are quite clearly as dominant as their record implies; hell, we should have won that Seahawks game if they would have properly called P.I. in the endzone. We lost the only other game to a division rival fielding our third string QB. When we got Brady back, we dominated the bills 41-25.
2. How did Seattle hand us a SB? You mean the SB where Tom threw for 4 TDs against the league's best defense, in the biggest game of the year? And if he's referring to the pass on goal line, the Hawks never should have been in that position in the first place. Kearse doesn't make that lucky catch, Hawks aren't even in position to give Marshawn a chance, and Malcom Butler probably doesn't even exist. And I'm tired of people dogging that play; if Butler wasn't as smart and had lesser instincts, that play would have EASILY been 6. Look no further than the Hawks/Falcons playoff game where Julio scored on that EXACT play on the goal line-- against Sherman, no less.
3. How is that a knock on the Pats? Getting to the AFCCG is an accomplishment in and of itself. Funny he tries to use this point to say we're not dominant; I mean, either you want us to win or not? Exactly how many other teams have been to the NFCCG/AFCCG that many times, in a row? You are actually proving we're dominant, you penis wrinkle.
4. Same as number 3; how many other teams have more than one SB in the past 11 years? Giants are the only ones, and those SBs came against US-- the team you're saying isn't dominant. If Rodney Harrison forces that ball to touch the ground, or if Asante Samuel makes that interception, Pats would be looking at their 7th ring in three weeks, more than the Steelers all time.
Simple fact is, no team has been more dominant or relevant in 17 years. Seahawks come closest and then maybe Denver. Everyone else is a victim of parity.
