Danger Zone
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2011
- Messages
- 3,718
- Reaction score
- 4,544
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments."For the season, Ryan beat Brady in completion percentage, yards per game, yards per attempt, passer rating and Total QBR. Ryan beat everybody in those last three categories. He did it for a team that had a far less effective defense than Brady's. The Patriots held opponents to a league-low 15.6 points per game, while Atlanta allowed 25.4. Ryan did it while taking 37 sacks, while Brady took only 15."
Yea, I get that. But sacks aren't just prevented by the OL. The QB can move, get rid of the ball quicker, throw it away, etc., all the stuff Brady does to make his OL look better than they sometimes are.
While it should be that maybe Ryan should get the ball out faster...............to avoid the sacks...The implication is that Ryan's O-line isn't as good as Brady's so his stats should be looked at in a better light..
We are in the ring business, screw the MVP.
"For the season, Ryan beat Brady in completion percentage, yards per game, yards per attempt, passer rating and Total QBR. Ryan beat everybody in those last three categories. He did it for a team that had a far less effective defense than Brady's. The Patriots held opponents to a league-low 15.6 points per game, while Atlanta allowed 25.4. Ryan did it while taking 37 sacks, while Brady took only 15."
When did taking sacks make one a better quarterback?
Awfully long article to basically make the one point that he couldn't play for the first 4 weeks.
This post is exactly the reason they do this. Its a polarizing topic expected to get people to react. Patriots/Brady are polarizing topics so they will do this all the time. They also did an article after the houston game how BB was a great genius. I bet non pat fans had rolled their eyes on that one as well.Didn't see this mentioned, and I'm sure most don't want to actually look at it, but they
do a really pretty egregious hatchet job on Tom. Disguised as 'nothing personal, but...', but
I really don't remember them doing such a lengthy article on why someone SHOULDN'T
win an award.
The case against Tom Brady as MVP
This post is exactly the reason they do this. Its a polarizing topic expected to get people to react. Patriots/Brady are polarizing topics so they will do this all the time. They also did an article after the houston game how BB was a great genius. I bet non pat fans had rolled their eyes on that one as well.
"For the season, Ryan beat Brady in completion percentage, yards per game, yards per attempt, passer rating and Total QBR. Ryan beat everybody in those last three categories. He did it for a team that had a far less effective defense than Brady's. The Patriots held opponents to a league-low 15.6 points per game, while Atlanta allowed 25.4. Ryan did it while taking 37 sacks, while Brady took only 15."
When did taking sacks make one a better quarterback?
Awfully long article to basically make the one point that he couldn't play for the first 4 weeks.
Whatever gets the clicks and the buzz
How many people in this thread actually clicked on the link? I didn't. I just responded to what someone else posted.
Well, when in doubt, give the MVP to Peyton Manning
Tom ****in Brady.
That's all. BSPN*, go pound sand.