8/14: NFLPA's latest submission is in

[Big-T]

"Hey Berman! You can't tell us what to do!" - NFL

Bet he will love reading that garbage.

 

[SVN]

Daniel Wallach ?@WALLACHLEGAL 14s14 seconds ago
NFL disparages Peterson case as an "out-of-circuit district court opinion . . . currently under appeal" (Me: but it's predicated on Rice)

Weird that the NFL would disparage a case that they are currently in contempt of court over.

Ask Wallach that ?

 

[Rob0729]

Ask Wallach that ?

Don't have a twitter account

 

[Oswlek]

Daniel Wallach?@WALLACHLEGAL
NFL: "The CBA provides that these questions were for the Commissioner to answer. Under the law, his judgment cannot be disturbed"

I had to read that three times because it honestly struck me as satire the first few times. I still feel like I should confirm this is a legitimate twitter handle and not the Onion or something. Really?

 

[TommyD4207]

Daniel Wallach?@WALLACHLEGAL
NFL: "The CBA provides that these questions were for the Commissioner to answer. Under the law, his judgment cannot be disturbed"

But...he disturbed his own judgement when he changed the parameters of the suspension.

 

[Rob0729]

I had to read that three times because it honestly struck me as satire the first few times. I still feel like I should confirm this is a legitimate twitter handle and not the Onion or something. Really?

This is like when I was a kid and my father grounded me for a week for not doing my homework before dinner and I asked how he could give me such an unfair punishment and his response was "Because I said so".

 

[Pats2000]

Anyone have the link to the NFL brief?

 

[5thRing-Hunt]

if brady loses im done watching the nfl.
the whole thing is a sham. i love how tom isn't backing down to ****sucker goodell.

I used to think that way but the NFL really made a mistake by filing in NY. This judge is allowing us to see everything in public. So with all this info even if Brady loses the battle I can confidently say it's been proven he didn't do anything. And I will stand behind Tom. Another QB like him may never come around again. I hope he achieves his goal and plays 7-8 more years with 3 or more sb appearances and at least one more sb win.

 

[SVN]

Daniel Wallach ?@WALLACHLEGAL 13m13 minutes ago
NFL: "Supreme Court precedent precludes a retrial of Brady’s disciplinary appeal in this Court. But that is precisely what the Union seeks"

What is this crap? Nash said the same thing that day. Any one explain what he means ? That the judge cannot ovverule NFL ? then why even file this before the NFLPA in court and why hasnt the judge thrown this case out yet ? Maybe I dont follow.

 

[Bruins29]

"Yeah, you cant disturb Roger's judgement" "And as soon as he makes up his mind on what that judgement will be about we will let you know" - NFL

 

[Deus Irae]

While I agree in theory, I still say to you that you should never claim victory until you have it, because you just never know when a judge is going to pull one out of his ass. See the passing, and upholding, of Obamacare if you have any doubts about that.

Who is EatSleepWinRepeat, and why was he asshat enough to click dislike on the above quote earlier in the thread?

 

[MuscleCarLover]

LINK???

 

[Soul_Survivor88]

Daniel Wallach?@WALLACHLEGAL
NFL: "The CBA provides that these questions were for the Commissioner to answer. Under the law, his judgment cannot be disturbed"

What the hell? Does Roger Goodell think he's God?

Shame on Kraft for ever trusting this man

 

[Rob0729]

LINK???

These guys are giving the most play by play:

https://twitter.com/SportsLawGuy?lang=en

https://twitter.com/WALLACHLEGAL

 

[Oswlek]

Daniel Wallach ?@WALLACHLEGAL 13m13 minutes ago
NFL: "Supreme Court precedent precludes a retrial of Brady’s disciplinary appeal in this Court. But that is precisely what the Union seeks"

What is this crap? Nash said the same thing that day. Any one explain what he means ? That the judge cannot ovverule NFL ? then why even file this before the NFLPA in court and why hasnt the judge thrown this case out yet ? Maybe I dont follow.

I know, it's absurd. The NFL is literally saying that judge Berman has no right to question the conclusions that they specifically asked him to validate. It is dumbfounding.

 

[TommyD4207]

I know, it's absurd. The NFL is literally saying that judge Berman has no right to question the conclusions that they specifically asked him to validate. It is dumbfounding.

Or that Goodell's findings "cannot be disturbed", even if he's the ONE THAT DISTURBED THEM.

 

[Rob0729]

Gabe Feldman ?@SportsLawGuy 53s54 seconds ago
NFL: "The evidence of Brady's obstruction of the league's investigation is not only substantial, but undisputed"

This one is going to be tough to uphold because Pash missed taking out the part where Ted Wells said Brady was cooperative in the Wells Report.

 

[Bruins29]

"Brady's disagreement with factual findings?" That is the problem...there are no facts.

 

[Ross12]

NFL: "Y'all can't retry this in court! Court has no place here! Oh also we were the ones who filed first but don't worry about that."

 

[Bruins29]

"Well your honor, he cooperated with us but obstructed the investigation." - NFL