Seriously, dude. I'm giving some friendly advice here. You look much, much less foolish if you admit "hey I was talking about the Sugar Bowl, I didn't see where you mentioned you were talking about the FIU game. It was an honest mistake on my part - my bad."
Really. I promise you it won't hurt one bit. Why you have to turn even the simplest of mistakes into a ridiculous pissing contest is beyond me.
And it wasn't a mistake. It was intentional. I haven't turned this into a pissing contest. Read each of your posts in this thread. Read all of your debtates in other threads. Read how many times you've said to someone "hope you're here in a few years so I can say 'told you so'". This is all started by you. I'm just getting entertainment out of this on top of obviously trolling you just a bit because you're taking it so personally.
I don't know why you have to start chest thumping. We're on opposite sides of this prediction. I just want you to promise me you'll be here so I can gloat once time has passed and proven me right.
Re: The bolded, what was that about you not starting a pissing contest?
Not chest thumping at all. I was just amazed by the bad example, the fact that you're leaning on the FIU game when it also proves your point is weak at best, and I'm still waiting on you to break down my list to show me where my ignorant and wrong points in this thread are. Again, show me which one of these is ignorant and/or wrong and explain in detail why they are...
1. Was Florida not one of the best defenses in college football that year?
2. Did Florida not have quite a few future pros on that defense?
3. Did Bridgewater not pick them apart?
4. Was the game not on a national stage?
5. Was there not a national viewing audience?
Says the guy with 25,000 posts.....
I hate to rain on your parade, but the average on that is 8 per day, most of them made during down time at work. You can feel free to check out my activity after the hours of 8-5 during the week days and at all on the weekends. My posts are all made available to you, each of them with a time stamp. Nice to see yet another logical fallacy tossed out on your end, though.
Anything else?