What blank check? I spoke numbers time and time again. If you're going to try to undercut me, at least do it with a bit of accuracy.
These are a few quotes that I could find with a quick search...
As for what the Patriots should have done, they should have adapted to the changed WR market:
2 years 20-21, 15 guaranteed
3 years 24-30, 16-20 guaranteed (I'd have looked at 3/24-3/27 as the expected range)
Either of the above could have been offered and, since they'd already franchised him, the 2 year deal would have been a low offer anyway, but would have given Welker a bit more security without ramping his price up higher than the double franchise tag. Reportedly, they never budged off of 2 years 16, which was an insult.
Hypothetical Deus 2012 suggested offer: $20M/2yrs, $15M guaranteed
Reported Pats' offer: $16M/2yrs, $16M guaranteed
Actual end result: $15.5M/2yrs, $9.5M guaranteed
He got $9 million for this year. He can get $11 million for one year if he's franchised again, or he can get a multi-year deal for much more if he hits the market. Why would he accept $7.5 million per, for the next 2 years, when he's playing as well as he is?
This year, the baseline's been reset. His minimum "Franchise" earning is now over $11 million in year one. Since his production hasn't waned at all, he has no real reason to accept the lower offers that would have looked so good last year. He should be able to make a killing on the market. Imagine the Colts looking at the idea of adding Welker to their offense, for example.
Hypothetical offer that Deus says Welker shouldn't consider: $15M/2yrs, less than $11M in year 1
Actual end result: $12M/2yrs, $6M in year 1
Deus' predicted Welker market: "He should be able to make a killing"
Actual Welker market: Anything but a killing
Now forgive me if I exaggerate your complete overrating of his market as offering him a blank check. For the months leading up to the inevitable Welker negotiation, you berated the Patriots for not offering him enough money or enough guarantees.
Turns out, that $16M/2yr contract that you were calling a complete BS offer for over a year was the best offer he ever got and better in both total money and guarantees than what he ended up getting.
You said there was no reason for Welker to consider a hypothetical $15M/2yr contract this past offseason. He didn't even get close to that, and the second year of the contract that he did get is the worst kind of additional year, one with no guaranteed money if he doesn't play well, but locks him in if he does.
Now sure, it's clear that in the 2013 offseason, the Patriots did not offer enough to get him re-signed. However, in hindsight their 2012 offer was more than fair and was better than what he got. Welker gambled on himself and lost. Their 2013 offer was at most underselling him by $1M a year, which is far better than the $3-4M a year you were overrating his value.
If you were in charge of a team, Welker and his agent would have been laughing hysterically at how much they took advantage of you compared to the rest of the market. So no, you weren't offering him a blank check. Yes, you were completely wrong and willing to vastly overpay him, and that's not the answer. And all of this is why I refuse to ever take you seriously when you complain about the Pats being cheap when it comes to Welker. Welker and his agent effed up, and so did you. The Pats played it correctly, yet both they and Welker missed out. NFL contracts are a two-way street, and I think it's completely ridiculous that you're upset with the team that in completely 20/20 hindsight made a move that would have been good for both Welker and the Patriots had Welker not completely misjudged the market for his services.