Okay a couple things:
- It doesn't make your team a power team if one guy can lower his shoulder.
- If we're talking about being a pass-first team, the Pats are a finesse team and have been for their whole history
- If we mean the Pats are a team with a defense that doesn't scare anybody, again, how scary can you claim to be when you make Ryan Fitzpatrick and Chad Henne look like world-beaters?
-- sub-point: um except Fitzpatrick, from the looks of things, might actually BE good.
-- sub-sub-point: um except the O just runs their routes, and it's the D that really misses the snaps in training camp more. So there may be a more extended offensive mirage out there right now.
- Attention draftniks - I'm sick and tired of "I'm so sick and tired of BB drafting guys that weren't my draft-day binkie." For every guy you were screaming at your TV about drafting, and who succeeded, there are probably a half-dozen busts too. Running selective memory through the filter of "toughness vs. finesse" is just another selective memory exercise.
Put another way, to all draftnik woulda-coulda-shoulda guys: There is a reason that you can't even be on the personnel department in Tennessee or somewhere, never mind in Foxboro.
Hey, nobody wants to be the finesse team. It's such a put-down in a tough game. But they did legalize the forward pass, and they've been making passing the point of the game more and more ever since. If you're saying "they have no running game because they do it by committee, there's not that one guy to be afraid of," once again, the whole league is moving more toward rbbc than feature back for a while now. If you mean the D... welp, that's valid and it needs fixing. It's not like you say to yourself "Oh crap it's third and one against the Pats... what do I do now???" or "How, oh how can we get on the scoreboard against that ferocious Pats D???"
But then again, a year ago, every other thread was about "when will we abandon that 3-4 defense???" Naturally, as with all other threads, there was no recognition that the big bold moves we "had to make" might come with any downside, right?
I'm not saying they don't need to try things to get the D fixed, but they can't possibly evaluate the "fixed" version of the D without at least 3 games in hand to review. They're not performing, I'm not arguing that. I'm just saying you might want to examine what's working and what's not... especially since everybody was so whiny about how inevitable it was that we had to get more pressure get more pressure blah blah blah.
Looks to me like the real problem is the other side also gets paid and you don't get to lead the league in every category on both sides of the ball (though I do agree that right now the Pats' D doesn't scare anybody.) Where I disagree is that the dum dums here have a better idea of how to fix it than the guys in foxboro.