PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

NFL vs. Comcast, round 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: NFL vs Comcast, round 1

I have comcast and I used to get NFL as part of the "regular" digital package. Its now bundled with a premium sports package. This is the way it is in most comcast markets.
 
Re: NFL vs Comcast, round 1

I have comcast and I used to get NFL as part of the "regular" digital package. Its now bundled with a premium sports package. This is the way it is in most comcast markets.

Same here. I am in Mass.
 
Last edited:
Re: NFL vs Comcast, round 1

I have comcast and I used to get NFL as part of the "regular" digital package. Its now bundled with a premium sports package. This is the way it is in most comcast markets.


Aaahh... gotcha. Yeah, it's a part of the regular digital package where I live, and a constant source of irritation to my wife
 
Re: NFL vs Comcast, round 1

Will the FCC also tell Comcast how many sheets of paper each executive can use to wipe in the men's room?
 
Re: NFL vs Comcast, round 1

Will the FCC also tell Comcast how many sheets of paper each executive can use to wipe in the men's room?

Once the FCC 'mandates' that a cable company provide 'free' a service that costs them a dollar, be prepared for a $5 rate hike. Of course I'm part of a shrinking minority who believes that as bad as rapacious cable companies etc. are, it's better for all if the reliably inept govt keeps out.
 
Re: NFL vs Comcast, round 1

I have comcast and I used to get NFL as part of the "regular" digital package. Its now bundled with a premium sports package. This is the way it is in most comcast markets.

Ditto in Atlanta.
 
Are they going to broadcast those Thursday night NFL Network games on the other channels again like they did with Giants-Pats week 17 last year? They damn sure better, at least for Pats-Jets. Dish Network doesnt have NFLN anymore
 
I don't understand this decision at all. The original lawsuit filed by the NFL Network (which Comcast won, but then had reversed on appeal) was about contract language between the two parties. The appellate court sent that case back to a lower court, where to the best of my knowledge it still sits. The discrimination thing is new to me, and unfortunately the decision itself (with it's rationale) hasn't yet been published in the Federal Register or on the FCC's website. I think we'll all have to wait until Tuesday (since Monday is a federal holiday) to figure this thing out.
 
Re: NFL vs Comcast, round 1

Once the FCC 'mandates' that a cable company provide 'free' a service that costs them a dollar, be prepared for a $5 rate hike. Of course I'm part of a shrinking minority who believes that as bad as rapacious cable companies etc. are, it's better for all if the reliably inept govt keeps out.



Bingo, the less the government gets involved the better. Of course I have Directv, and they have always had NFLN as part of the basic package!
 
I'd like to see Comcast or Time Warner be able to bid for the NFL package. Right now its such a monopoly with Directv being the only carrier and they nickel and dime customers for the digital package that's another $100 on top of the base package.
 
Are they going to broadcast those Thursday night NFL Network games on the other channels again like they did with Giants-Pats week 17 last year? They damn sure better, at least for Pats-Jets. Dish Network doesnt have NFLN anymore

i have dish n/w with nfln here in the bay area.
 
i have dish n/w with nfln here in the bay area.

I was watching it tonight and I have Dish Network also and live in Maine so I'm not sure what he is writing about.
 
Senator Specter launching investigation in 3... 2... 1....

Too bad the Senator from Philly wasn't quite as enamoured with watching Wall Street as he was looking out for Comcast and going after the NFL during Spygate.
 
To the comcast subscribers who have to pay for an extra sports tier to get NFLN, just be glad you can get it at all. With Time Warner Cable you can't.
 
i have dish n/w with nfln here in the bay area.

I'm in PA. Had it last season, this season I don't. I was overseas much of the year so I don't know exactly when we stopped getting it.
 
I'd like to see Comcast or Time Warner be able to bid for the NFL package. Right now its such a monopoly with Directv being the only carrier and they nickel and dime customers for the digital package that's another $100 on top of the base package.

Why do you think cable didn't have the chance to get it? It's worth much more per subscriber to DirecTV, DirecTV pays quite a lot for it and has likely outbid everyone.

I don't understand this decision at all. The original lawsuit filed by the NFL Network (which Comcast won, but then had reversed on appeal) was about contract language between the two parties. The appellate court sent that case back to a lower court, where to the best of my knowledge it still sits. The discrimination thing is new to me, and unfortunately the decision itself (with it's rationale) hasn't yet been published in the Federal Register or on the FCC's website. I think we'll all have to wait until Tuesday (since Monday is a federal holiday) to figure this thing out.

I assume a large part of the decision is the fact that Comcast owns Versus and puts it in the standard package. This is seen as anticompetitive because they are using the content delivery part of their business to hurt competitors of the content creation part of the business. There is a certain logic there considering that cable is in many ways a monopoly -- yes, FIOS, satellite, etc. are available to some, but they are not available to nearly everyone.
 
Just moved into a new house in Denver and was in limbo... looks like I'll wait a little bit more.
 
I assume a large part of the decision is the fact that Comcast owns Versus and puts it in the standard package. This is seen as anticompetitive because they are using the content delivery part of their business to hurt competitors of the content creation part of the business. There is a certain logic there considering that cable is in many ways a monopoly -- yes, FIOS, satellite, etc. are available to some, but they are not available to nearly everyone.
That certainly makes sense. Of course, this is going to be an ongoing problem - involving many parties beyond the NFL - if last-mile providers (such as cable companies) are able to produce content as well. The network neutrality debate's come home all of a sudden.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

PatsFans.com LinkHub

Sean Payton's second chance: Inside the Denver Broncos' Super Bowl quest
Interesting Article (Sports)
espn.com · by Ian
6h
𝕏 / Tweet
twitter.com: Wilfork Highlight Reel
Patriots Videos
twitter.com · by ctpatsfan77
22h
𝕏 / Tweet
twitter.com
Interesting Article (Sports)
twitter.com · by raduray
22h
📰
📰 Article
Terrion Arnold clears waivers despite interest from teams
NFL News
prideofdetroit.com · by mayoclinic
1d
📰
📰 Article
Drake Maye got swallowed up by the moment, and the Super Bowl setback left him in tears
Patriots Commentary
nytimes.com · by TheRainMaker
1d
▶ YouTube
Super Bowl 36: “I still can’t believe the middle of the field was so wide open.”
Patriots Classic Videos
youtube.com · by Ian
1d
📰 Article
media0.giphy.com
Uncategorized
media0.giphy.com · by PATSNUTme
2d
📰
📰 Article
Patriots DC Zak Kuhr's Motivation Stems From Two Important Things
Interesting Article (Sports)
si.com · by mayoclinic
4d
MORSE: Patriots Position Analysis: Defensive Line
Patriots News 07-05, Positions That Still Need More Depth
MORSE: Patriots Position Breakdown, QBs and Tight Ends
Patriots News 06-28: Romeo Doubs The Patriots X Factor?
MORSE: Patriots Position Breakdown – RB
Patriots News 06-20: The Not-So-Ideal Jacas Situation
MORSE: Looking At Patriots Wide Receiver Room and Gabe Jacas Mess
Key Questions Remain After Patriots Mini Camp: Little Margin For Error at Several Positions
Patriots News 06-14, Patriots Wrap Up Spring Workouts
Patriots Rookie Lomu Reveals “Weird” First Days at Right Tackle
Back
Top