- Joined
- Mar 13, 2005
- Messages
- 20,536
- Reaction score
- 1
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.:confused2: !!Going for two accomplishes nothing here. Why are they going for it?
:confused2: !!
Going for two accomplishes nothing here. Why are they going for it?
I guess Rodgers and McCarthy just were feeling good.
I was wondering if the clock might run for a two point conversion, but I guess not...I guess Rodgers and McCarthy just were feeling good.
I was wondering if the clock might run for a two point conversion, but I guess not...
EDIT: Unless Crosby was injured?
they have no reason NOT to, and say they get a deep return, FG, onside, they only ned a FG to win. unlikely yea, but there is no downside to going for two in this situation.
Beat the offside kick; if Bears get within FG and nail a long one then happenstance win a offside kick..
they have no reason NOT to, and say they get a deep return, FG, onside, they only ned a FG to win. unlikely yea, but there is no downside to going for two in this situation.
Or the goat. LOL
Ok. It's too early in the game to give away points. For example, at the time it was 10-8, if green bay kicks two field goals it's 16-8, and you wish you had gone for 1 if you didn't make the 2. If it's 10-2 and 5 minutes left, then you go for 2. Obviously 17-8 is an even worse situation.