ARE YOU NEW HERE? NOT LOGGED IN? PLEASE TAKE A MOMENT TO REGISTER FOR AN ACCOUNT AND LOGIN TO REMOVE THIS WINDOW
Welcome to PatsFans.com. Do you have an account? If not - please take a moment to register for our forum and experience a much smoother experience with fewer ads, along with no longer having to see this notification window. Also learn about how you can receive a free Patriots T-Shirt from the Patriots Official ProShop by CLICKING HERE. Please enjoy your stay here, and Go Pats!
I'm a 49er fan. I definitely love your offense, but even your defense impressed me today. Of course you once had a great defense. Please explain what makes the offense and defense works. Which types of plays, concepts, player sizes and styles you prefer on offense and defense. Please be specific instead of just saying intelligence or versatile players.
And why did Belichick move to the 4-3? I read him saying that it made it easier to go from nickle to base if the front was the same. I'm curious if he sees this as a permanent change, or if he wants to get back to the 3-4 when he can because he still thinks it's superior.
Secondly, I just want to say that it will be a great game this week.
Last edited by wiltondeportes; 12-10-2012 at 11:57 PM..
FEATURED ADVERTISEMENT
DONATE TO PATSFANS.COM
RECEIVE A FREE PATS T-SHIRT AND SAVE 15% OFF WHEN YOU BUY FROM THE OFFICIAL PROSHOP!
Free T-Shirt & Save 15% Off!
Like Our Site? Please help support our site and server costs by DONATING TO PATSFANS.COM and receive a FREE PATRIOTS T-SHIRT and SAVE 15% off EVERY purchase you make from PatriotsProShop.com. You'll also receive added benefits to your account including Removing All Ads During Your Experience Here At Our Forum.
NEEDED YEARLY SITE DONATIONS: 345 | CURRENT # OF SUBSCRIBED SUPPORTERS: 98
I'm a 49er fan. I definitely love your offense, but even your defense impressed me today. Of course you once had a great defense. Please explain what makes the offense and defense works. Which types of plays, concepts, player sizes and styles you prefer on offense and defense. Please be specific instead of just saying intelligence or versatile players.
And why did Belichick move to the 4-3? I read him saying that it made it easier to go from nickle to base if the front was the same. I'm curious if he sees this as a permanent change, or if he wants to get back to the 3-4 when he can because he still thinks it's superior.
Secondly, I just want to say that it will be a great game this week.
In general, Belichick prefers a read-and-react style defense to an attacking one, and that is reflected in most of his decisions.
Up front, he is an ardent believer in two-gap schemes. He likes his DT to be big bodied guys who can command double teams and hold the POA in the run game. He also generally likes big players. For example, the Pats starting defensive tackles (Vince Wilfork and Kyle Love) are listed at 325 and 315 but are probably both around 330 lbs right now. The linebackers are large by NFL standards - Mayo, Spikes, and Hightower weigh in at 250, 255, and 270 respectively. BB likes big guys. Doesn't blitz much, either, and runs very few stunts.
Historically, in the secondary he has utilized bump-and-run coverage a lot. He also likes to use zone/man combo coverages, where defenders react to the way the play unfolds and play man within zones. Also uses a lot of quarters. Plays LCB and RCB - no moving corners around.
As for scheme, he's been getting a little more creative each week. Sending Mayo on more blitzes, for example.
In general, Belichick prefers a read-and-react style defense to an attacking one, and that is reflected in most of his decisions.
Up front, he is an ardent believer in two-gap schemes. He likes his DT to be big bodied guys who can command double teams and hold the POA in the run game. He also generally likes big players. For example, the Pats starting defensive tackles (Vince Wilfork and Kyle Love) are listed at 325 and 315 but are probably both around 330 lbs right now. The linebackers are large by NFL standards - Mayo, Spikes, and Hightower weigh in at 250, 255, and 270 respectively. BB likes big guys. Doesn't blitz much, either, and runs very few stunts.
Historically, in the secondary he has utilized bump-and-run coverage a lot. He also likes to use zone/man combo coverages, where defenders react to the way the play unfolds and play man within zones. Also uses a lot of quarters. Plays LCB and RCB - no moving corners around.
As for scheme, he's been getting a little more creative each week. Sending Mayo on more blitzes, for example.
Ah, all of that makes a lot of sense to me. I can see why he has struggled in more recent years with offenses getting more spread out. His philosophies worked better when teams ran a base offense most of the game.
Now, do you see him changing at all? Could he go back to the 3-4 next year, or is the 4-3 what he views as the better choice all things considered? Or would he truly prefer to be multiple from week to week?
And let's talk offense for a minute. I know a bit, but I'd rather hear your side first.
Last edited by wiltondeportes; 12-11-2012 at 10:38 AM..
Ah, all of that makes a lot of sense to me. I can see why he has struggled in more recent years with offenses getting more spread out. His philosophies worked better when teams ran a base offense most of the game.
Exactly. If Belichick's defenses have had a hallmark, its being smart and physical, and not being able to do the latter near the LOS much anymore has made his brand of defense (sound, fundamentals-based) much harder to play. You have to gamble more in the modern NFL, and disrupt plays sooner, and BB is still figuring out how to balance that with a scheme that has brought him a ton of success over the past decades.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiltondeportes
Now, do you see him changing at all? Could he go back to the 3-4 next year, or is the 4-3 what he views as the better choice all things considered? Or would he truly prefer to be multiple from week to week?
It'll be 4-3 for a while, considering the DL personnel. But he still busts out the 3-4. For example, during last year's playoff run we didn't have a defensive end after Andre Carter went down. So he put Brandon Deaderick at 5-tech on one side of the line and Mark Anderson at 4-3 RE, shaded the linebackers over to the right side, and put Ninkovich on the end of the line like a 3-4 OLB. We've seen similar 50/50 looks a few times this year, except with Chandler Jones shifting inside to a 5-tech role, Ninkovich playing rush end, and Hightower standing on the line.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wiltondeportes
And let's talk offense for a minute. Ia know a bit, but I'd rather hear your side first.
Tom Brady. On that subject, I'd rather defer to the more knowledgeable though.
Last edited by Get it shawtaay; 12-11-2012 at 04:24 PM..
The Patriot scheme is whatever your scheme is weak at.
I'm not being cute, Belichick prefers versatile personnel to be able to switch formations and styles week to week.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
The Patriots have been overachievers the past two years. It doesn't have the talent to compensate for injuries, and it wins so much because it puts in 99% effort in the regular season and plays with terrific schemes to mask its deficiencies.
But in the playoffs a good team at 99% will not beat emotional, talented teams that play at 100%. It's what happened against the Giants in 2011 and the Ravens in 2012.
Tom Brady. On that subject, I'd rather defer to the more knowledgeable though.
Ok, I'll start it then. His scheme seems to have two separate offenses: the Run-N-Shoot and old school smashmouth football. Get ahead, get ahead some more, and then run the ball. There seem to be a whole lot of sight adjustments for receivers, so they value intelligence highly.
Currently, their passing scheme has been made into more of a ball control offense than the high flying O they had with Moss. Now, they want to control the first 10-15 yards of the line of scrimmage. They use a spread concept of screens to help keep the defense honest and attack weaknesses ASAP. Their WRs are all about getting separation, catching the ball, and being tough. They could give a damn if they're 6'3" 220. What they want are the guys with maximum acceleration in and out of cuts so that they create initial separation so Brady gets them the ball. The tight ends are the moving pieces that connect the passing to the running. You use a traditional TE in Gronk and a hybrid TE in Hernandez. These guys get you better mismatches than even a 6'3" 220 WR would have that mentioned earlier, and you never have to leave base personnel to do it. In the sense, all four of your receivers in a 2WR 2TE set create a nice mismatch, especially in relation to the first 10-15 yards from scrimmage. If either of your top WRs had more speed, that would be one more element of the offense, but that's not what the system relies on.
Now, your running game is not something I am as well-versed on. I've seen a lot of zone blocking from you guys, but I would imagine there's more. If you don't use a fullback much, it certainly lends to running zone plays. Fill me in more here.
Personnel:
QB: Emphasis on throwing power, accuracy, and intelligence. This is a very classic dropback passer that is allowed to be a statue in the pocket.
RB: They want a stable. A couple that run the smashmouth game, and a couple scatbacks for the shotgun game as well as a change of pace for the running game.
TE: Critical to the current O. They want a couple great blockers and a couple great receivers. At least one guy (Gronk) is great at both, so they utilize him to disguise to defenses what they're doing.
WR: Size doesn't matter. Change of direction, separation, good hands, and intelligence are what they want. Luckily, other teams don't draft those types of WRs early in the draft.
OL: Emphasis on pass blocking ability without sacrificing size. Seeming emphasis on guards. Fill me in more here.
Thoughts? Please add anything that I'm missing.
Last edited by wiltondeportes; 12-11-2012 at 05:53 PM..
Simply put.....Schemes are developed on a team by team basis..as mentioned...attacking the weak points of a team on both sides of the ball....and defending their strong points....
__________________
They laughed at us when we were 1-15...They hate us after 3 Championships plus 2 other shots.....they all can kiss my...... To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Last edited by Chopblock CB; 12-11-2012 at 09:12 PM..
I'm a 49er fan. I definitely love your offense, but even your defense impressed me today. Of course you once had a great defense. Please explain what makes the offense and defense works. Which types of plays, concepts, player sizes and styles you prefer on offense and defense. Please be specific instead of just saying intelligence or versatile players.
And why did Belichick move to the 4-3? I read him saying that it made it easier to go from nickle to base if the front was the same. I'm curious if he sees this as a permanent change, or if he wants to get back to the 3-4 when he can because he still thinks it's superior.
Secondly, I just want to say that it will be a great game this week.
Whatever BB feels is the strength of your team he will try and neutralize it. For example if the niners like to run he will scheme the defense to stop it and make Kapernick win the game. BB will then try to confuse a young QB like Kapernick with different defensive looks which change all the time.
Simply put.....Schemes are developed on a team by team basis..as mentioned...attacking the weak points of a team on both sides of the ball....and defending their strong points....
Quote:
Originally Posted by reflexblue
Whatever BB feels is the strength of your team he will try and neutralize it. For example if the niners like to run he will scheme the defense to stop it and make Kapernick win the game. BB will then try to confuse a young QB like Kapernick with different defensive looks which change all the time.
Y'all make it sound like it's mystical. Can you get out of the clouds and explain the tactics instead of the philosophy?